A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
arXiv:1305.0377 · doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18
Abstract
Nowadays, the worlds scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems that two most extensive databases are Web of Science and Scopus. Besides searching the literature, these two databases used to rank journals in terms of their productivity and the total citations received to indicate the journals impact, prestige or influence. This article attempts to provide a comprehensive comparison of these databases to answer frequent questions which researchers ask, such as: How Web of Science and Scopus are different? In which aspects these two databases are similar? Or, if the researchers are forced to choose one of them, which one should they prefer? For answering these questions, these two databases will be compared based on their qualitative and quantitative characteristics.
9 pages, 4 figures
Cited by in corpus (7)
- The Journal Coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A Comparative Analysis
- National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers
- Quantitative Technology Forecasting: a Review of Trend Extrapolation Methods
- Open Reproducible Publication Research
- Big Data Analytics in Humanitarian and Disaster Operations: A Systematic Review
- A weighted unified informetrics based on Scopus and WoS
- A paper's corresponding affiliation and first affiliation are consistent at the country level in Web of Science