Open Reproducible Publication Research
arXiv:2301.13312 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294946
Abstract
Considerable scientific work involves locating, analyzing, systematizing, and synthesizing other publications. Its results end up in a paper's "background" section or in standalone articles, which include meta-analyses and systematic literature reviews. The required research is aided through the use of online scientific publication databases and search engines, such as Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. However, use of online databases suffers from a lack of repeatability and transparency, as well as from technical restrictions. Thankfully, open data, powerful personal computers, and open source software now make it possible to run sophisticated publication studies on the desktop in a self-contained environment that peers can readily reproduce. Here we report a Python software package and an associated command-line tool that can populate embedded relational databases with slices from the complete set of Crossref publication metadata, ORCID author records, and other open data sets, for in-depth processing through performant queries. We demonstrate the software's utility by analyzing the underlying dataset's contents, by visualizing the evolution of publications in diverse scientific fields and relationships among them, by outlining scientometric facts associated with COVID-19 research, and by replicating commonly-used bibliometric measures of productivity, impact, and disruption.
arXiv comment37 pages, 10 figures, 3 tables
References in corpus (6)
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
- A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases
- OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts
- Finding Trends in Software Research
- Quantifying the rise and fall of scientific fields
- Open Reproducible Publication Research