Model-Free Multi-Probe Lensing Reconstruction of Cluster Mass Profiles
arXiv:1302.0514 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/13
Abstract
Lens magnification by galaxy clusters induces characteristic spatial variations in the number counts of background sources, amplifying their observed fluxes and expanding the area of sky, the net effect of which, known as magnification bias, depends on the intrinsic faint-end slope of the source luminosity function. The bias is strongly negative for red galaxies, dominated by the geometric area distortion, whereas it is mildly positive for blue galaxies, enhancing the blue counts toward the cluster center. We generalize the Bayesian approach of Umetsu et al. for reconstructing projected cluster mass profiles, by incorporating multiple populations of background sources for magnification bias measurements and combining them with complementary lens distortion measurements, effectively breaking the mass-sheet degeneracy and improving the statistical precision of cluster mass measurements. The approach can be further extended to include strong-lensing projected mass estimates, thus allowing for non-parametric absolute mass determinations in both the weak and strong regimes. We apply this method to our recent CLASH lensing measurements of MACS J1206.2-0847, and demonstrate how combining multi-probe lensing constraints can improve the reconstruction of cluster mass profiles. This method will also be useful for a stacked lensing analysis, combining all lensing-related effects in the cluster regime, for a definitive determination of the averaged mass profile.
13 pages, 2 figures; Typo corrections (Appendix A.2.) to match the published version in ApJ
References in corpus (23)
- A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter
- COSMOS Photometric Redshifts with 30-bands for 2-deg2
- zCOSMOS: A Large VLT/VIMOS redshift survey covering 0 < z < 3 in the COSMOS field
- A Bayesian approach to strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters
- Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689
- The Density Profiles of Massive, Relaxed Galaxy Clusters. II. Separating Luminous and Dark Matter in Cluster Cores
- The Density Profiles of Massive, Relaxed Galaxy Clusters. I. The Total Density Over Three Decades in Radius
- Cluster Lenses
- Weighing the Giants - I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images
- CLASH: The enhanced lensing efficiency of the highly elongated merging cluster MACS J0416.1-2403
- Combining Lens Distortion and Depletion to Map the Mass Distribution of A1689
- Alignment between galaxies and large-scale structure
- The Highest Resolution Mass Map of Galaxy Cluster Substructure To Date Without Assuming Light Traces Mass: LensPerfect Analysis of Abell 1689
- Large Einstein Radii: A Problem for LambdaCDM
- Measuring the Mass Distribution in Galaxy Clusters
- Mass and Gas Profiles in A1689: Joint X-ray and Lensing Analysis
- Gravitational lensing model degeneracies: Is steepness all-important?
- A spectacular giant arc in the massive cluster lens MACSJ1206.2-0847
- Lensing degeneracies and mass substructure
- Full Lensing Analysis of Abell 1703: Comparison of Independent Lens-Modelling Techniques
- Testing phenomenological and theoretical models of dark matter density profiles with galaxy clusters
- The cluster lens ACO 1703: redshift contrast and the inner profile
- Weak Lensing Mass Calibration with Shear and Magnification
Cited by in corpus (31)
- The FIP and Inverse FIP Effects in Solar and Stellar Coronae
- CLASH: Weak-Lensing Shear-and-Magnification Analysis of 20 Galaxy Clusters
- The Frontier Fields Lens Modeling Comparison Project
- CLASH: Joint Analysis of Strong-Lensing, Weak-Lensing Shear and Magnification Data for 20 Galaxy Clusters
- Photodissociation and X-Ray Dominated Regions
- Cluster-galaxy weak lensing
- The miniJPAS survey: a preview of the Universe in 56 colours
- Lensing Constraints on the Mass Profile Shape and the Splashback Radius of Galaxy Clusters
- CLASH: Complete Lensing Analysis of the Largest Cosmic Lens MACS J0717.5+3745 and Surrounding Structures
- Three-dimensional Multi-probe Analysis of the Galaxy Cluster A1689
- The Projected Dark and Baryonic Ellipsoidal Structure of 20 CLASH Galaxy Clusters
- CLASH: Accurate Photometric Redshifts with 14 HST bands in Massive Galaxy Cluster Cores
- The mass-concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects
- The Richness-to-Mass Relation of CAMIRA Galaxy Clusters from Weak-lensing Magnification in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
- Detection of Enhancement in Number Densities of Background Galaxies due to Magnification by Massive Galaxy Clusters
- CFHTLenS: A Weak Lensing Shear Analysis of the 3D-Matched-Filter Galaxy Clusters
- Comparing gravitational redshifts of SDSS galaxy clusters with the magnification redshift enhancement of background BOSS galaxies
- CLUMP-3D: Three-dimensional Shape and Structure of 20 CLASH Galaxy Clusters from Combined Weak and Strong Lensing
- Cosmological Parameter Determination in Free-Form Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling
- Probing Vainsthein-screening gravity with galaxy clusters using internal kinematics and strong and weak lensing
- An IllustrisTNG View of the Caustic Technique for Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimation
- Testing emergent gravity with mass densities of galaxy clusters
- Line-of-sight Elongation and Hydrostatic Mass Bias of the Frontier Fields Galaxy Cluster Abell 370
- Mass accretion rates of the HectoMAP clusters of galaxies
- Improving lensing cluster mass estimate with flexion
- Joint cluster reconstructions: Combining free-form lensing and X-rays
- The feedback of massive stars on interstellar astrochemical processes
- A short review on joint weak and strong cluster lens-mass reconstruction
- The BUFFALO HST Survey
- FIR Spectroscopy of the Galactic Center: Hot and Warm Molecular Gas
- CLASH-VLT: The Fifth Force in Chameleon Gravity from Joint Lensing and Kinematics Cluster Mass Profiles