Punishment in Public Goods games leads to meta-stable phase transitions and hysteresis
arXiv:1210.5233 · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046005
Abstract
The evolution of cooperation has been a perennial problem in evolutionary biology because cooperation can be undermined by selfish cheaters who gain an advantage in the short run, while compromising the long-term viability of the population. Evolutionary game theory has shown that under certain conditions, cooperation nonetheless evolves stably, for example if players have the opportunity to punish cheaters that benefit from a public good yet refuse to pay into the common pool. However, punishment has remained enigmatic because it is costly, and difficult to maintain. On the other hand, cooperation emerges naturally in the Public Goods game if the synergy of the public good (the factor multiplying the public good investment) is sufficiently high. In terms of this synergy parameter, the transition from defection to cooperation can be viewed as a phase transition with the synergy as the critical parameter. We show here that punishment reduces the critical value at which cooperation occurs, but also creates the possibility of meta-stable phase transitions, where populations can "tunnel" into the cooperating phase below the critical value. At the same time, cooperating populations are unstable even above the critical value, because a group of defectors that are large enough can "nucleate" such a transition. We study the mean-field theoretical predictions via agent-based simulations of finite populations using an evolutionary approach where the decisions to cooperate or to punish are encoded genetically in terms of evolvable probabilities. We recover the theoretical predictions and demonstrate that the population shows hysteresis, as expected in systems that exhibit super-heating and super-cooling. We conclude that punishment can stabilize populations of cooperators below the critical point, but it is a two-edged sword: it can also stabilize defectors above the critical point.
22 pages, 9 figures. Slight title change, version that appears in Physical Biology
References in corpus (10)
- Punish, but not too hard: How costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game
- Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool-punishment
- Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions
- Self-organization of punishment in structured populations
- Correlation of positive and negative reciprocity fails to confer an evolutionary advantage: Phase transitions to elementary strategies
- Evolutionary advantages of adaptive rewarding
- Effectiveness of conditional punishment for the evolution of public cooperation
- Impact of Epistasis and Pleiotropy on Evolutionary Adaptation
- Critical dynamics in the evolution of stochastic strategies for the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
- Evolution and stability of altruist strategies in microbial games
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Statistical physics of human cooperation
- Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game
- Exploring optimal institutional incentives for public cooperation
- Evolutionary potential games on lattices
- What is Information?
- Thermodynamics of Evolutionary Games
- Promoting Cooperation in the Public Goods Game using Artificial Intelligent Agents