Does the Sun work as a nuclear fusion amplifier of planetary tidal forcing? A proposal for a physical mechanism based on the mass-luminosity relation
arXiv:1205.4061 · doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2012.04.002
Abstract
Empirical evidences show that planetary tides may influence solar activity: 1) the 11-yr Schwabe sunspot number cycle is constrained between the spring tidal period of Jupiter and Saturn, 9.93 yr, and the tidal orbital period of Jupiter, 11.86 yr, and a model based on these cycles reconstructs solar dynamics at multiple time ; 2) a measure of the alignment of Venus, Earth and Jupiter reveals quasi 11.07-yr cycles well correlated to the 11-year Schwabe solar cycles; 3) there exists a 11.08 yr cyclical recurrence in the solar jerk-shock vector, which is induced mostly by Mercury and Venus. However, Newtonian classical physics fails to explain the phenomenon. Only by means of a significant nuclear fusion amplification of the tidal gravitational potential energy released in the Sun, may planetary tides produce irradiance output oscillations with a sufficient magnitude to influence solar dynamo processes. Here we use an adaptation of the well-known mass-luminosity relation to calculate a conversion factor between the solar luminosity and the potential gravitational power associated to the mass lost by nuclear fusion: the average estimated amplification factor is A=4,250,000. We use this magnification factor to evaluate the theoretical luminosity oscillations that planetary tides may potentially stimulate inside the solar core by making its nuclear fusion rate oscillate. By converting the power related to this energy into solar irradiance units at 1 AU we find that the tidal oscillations may be able to theoretically induce an oscillating luminosity increase from 0.05-0.65 to 0.25-1.63 , which is a range compatible with the ACRIM satellite observed total solar irradiance fluctuations. In conclusion, the Sun, by means of its nuclear active core, may be working as a great amplifier of the small planetary tidal energy dissipated in it.
27 pages, 13 figures
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (21)
- High-frequency cyclicity in the Mediterranean Messinian evaporites: evidence for solar-lunar climate forcing
- On the astronomical origin of the Hallstatt oscillation found in radiocarbon and climate records throughout the Holocene
- How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate
- ACRIM total solar irradiance satellite composite validation versus TSI proxy models
- The complex planetary synchronization structure of the solar system
- Discussion on the spectral coherence between planetary, solar and climate oscillations: a reply to some critiques
- Planetary harmonics in the historical Hungarian aurora record (1523-1960)
- Prudence in estimating coherence between planetary, solar and climate oscillations
- The planetary theory of solar activity variability: a review
- The Mid-term and Long-term Solar Quasi-periodic Cycles and the Possible Relationship with Planetary Motions
- Comment on "The influence of planetary attractions on the solar tachocline" by Callebaut, de Jager and Duhau
- A synchronized two-dimensional model of the solar dynamo
- Tidal Forcing on the Sun and the 11-year Solar Activity Cycle
- No evidence for absence of solar dynamo synchronization
- Synchronizing the helicity of Rayleigh-Bénard convection by a tide-like electromagnetic forcing
- Detection, attribution, and modeling of climate change: key open issues
- Revisiting 154-day periodicity in the occurrence of hard flares. A planetary influence?
- Tidally synchronized solar dynamo: a rebuttal
- Multiple regression analysis of anthropogenic and heliogenic climate drivers, and some cautious forecasts
- Sensitivity of sunspot area to the tidal effect of planet Mercury during solar cycle 23
- Reply to Hunter and Brown Discussion of Is there any support in the long term tide gauge data to the claims that parts of Sydney will be swamped by rising sea levels?, Coastal Engineering 2012;64:161-167, Coastal Engineering 2013;75:1-3