paper

The Environments of Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts and Implications for their Progenitors

arXiv:1005.1068 · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2010.10.001

Abstract

[Abridged] The study of short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) experienced a complete revolution in recent years thanks to the discovery of the first afterglows and host galaxies in May 2005. These observations demonstrated that short GRBs are cosmological in origin, reside in both star forming and elliptical galaxies, are not associated with supernovae, and span a wide isotropic-equivalent energy range of ~10^48-10^52 erg. However, a fundamental question remains unanswered: What are the progenitors of short GRBs? The most popular theoretical model invokes the coalescence of compact object binaries with neutron star and/or black hole constituents. However, additional possibilities exist, including magnetars formed through prompt channels (massive star core-collapse) and delayed channels (binary white dwarf mergers, white dwarf accretion-induced collapse), or accretion-induced collapse of neutron stars. In this review I summarize our current knowledge of the galactic and sub-galactic environments of short GRBs, and use these observations to draw inferences about the progenitor population. The most crucial results are: (i) some short GRBs explode in dead elliptical galaxies; (ii) the majority of short GRBs occur in star forming galaxies; (iii) the star forming hosts of short GRBs are distinct from those of long GRBs (lower star formation rates, and higher luminosities and metallicities), and instead appear to be drawn from the general field galaxy population; (iv) the physical offsets of short GRBs relative to their host galaxy centers are significantly larger than for long GRBs; (v) the observed offset distribution is in good agreement with predictions for NS-NS binary mergers; and (vi) short GRBs trace under-luminous locations within their hosts, but appear to be more closely correlated with the rest-frame optical light (old stars) than the UV light (young massive stars).

Solicited review in New Astronomy Reviews; accepted version; 24 pages, 23 figures; version with full resolution figures available from https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~eberger/eberger_shb_nar.pdf

References in corpus (26)

Cited by in corpus (75)