On the relation between the isotropy of the CMB and the geometry of the universe
arXiv:0903.3013 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.123522
Abstract
The near-isotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is considered to be the strongest indication for the homogeneity and isotropy of the universe, a cornerstone of most cosmological analysis. We derive new theorems which extend the Ehlers-Geren-Sachs result that an isotropic CMB implies that the universe is either stationary or homogeneous and isotropic, and its generalisation to the almost isotropic case. We discuss why the theorems do not apply to the real universe, and why the CMB observations do not imply that the universe would be nearly homogeneous and isotropic.
arXiv comment5 pages. v2: Corrected an error in the proof, added references and clarifications
References in corpus (17)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results
- The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set
- 4-Year COBE DMR Cosmic Microwave Background Observations: Maps and Basic Results
- Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure
- Accelerated expansion from structure formation
- Asymptotic self-similarity breaking at late times in cosmology
- LIMITS ON ANISOTROPY AND INHOMOGENEITY FROM THE COSMIC BACKGROUND RADIATION,
- Light propagation in statistically homogeneous and isotropic dust universes
- An almost isotropic cosmic microwave temperature does not imply an almost isotropic universe
- Evaluating backreaction with the peak model of structure formation
- Anisotropic universes with isotropic cosmic microwave background radiation
- Does the Isotropy of the CMB Imply a Homogeneous Universe? Some Generalised EGS Theorems
- Theorems on shear-free perfect fluids with their Newtonian analogues
- Undermining the Cosmological Principle: Almost Isotropic Observations in Inhomogeneous Cosmologies
- The Limits on Cosmological Anisotropies and Inhomogeneities from COBE Data
- Inhomogeneous cosmologies, the Copernican principle and the cosmic microwave background: More on the EGS theorem
- Cosmic microwave background limits on spatially homogeneous cosmological models with dark energy
Cited by in corpus (27)
- Beyond CDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead
- Backreaction in late-time cosmology
- Inhomogeneity and the foundations of concordance cosmology
- Establishing homogeneity of the universe in the shadow of dark energy
- Is the Universe homogeneous?
- Backreaction: directions of progress
- Light propagation in statistically homogeneous and isotropic universes with general matter content
- Average expansion rate and light propagation in a cosmological Tardis spacetime
- Model-independent cosmological constraints from the CMB
- Applicability of the linearly perturbed FRW metric and Newtonian cosmology
- Multipole decomposition of the general luminosity distance 'Hubble law' -- a new framework for observational cosmology
- Solving the curvature and Hubble parameter inconsistencies through structure formation-induced curvature
- Light propagation and the average expansion rate in near-FRW universes
- Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
- Inhomogeneous cosmology and backreaction: Current status and future prospects
- A covariant treatment of cosmic parallax
- The isotropic blackbody CMB as evidence for a homogeneous universe
- What if Planck's Universe isn't flat?
- Violation of the FRW consistency condition as a signature of backreaction
- The quadrupole in the local Hubble parameter: first constraints using Type Ia supernova data and forecasts for future surveys
- Space-time second-quantization effects and the quantum origin of cosmological constant in covariant quantum gravity
- Evaluating backreaction with the ellipsoidal collapse model
- Backreaction and the Covariant Formalism of General Relativity
- Cosmological models and stability
- On almost Ehlers-Geren-Sachs theorems
- Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems -- do their resolutions really depend upon inflation?
- Redshift and gauge choice