Hemispherical power asymmetry: parameter estimation from CMB WMAP5 data
arXiv:0808.2867 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/09/023
Abstract
We reexamine the evidence of the hemispherical power asymmetry, detected in the CMB WMAP data using a new method. At first, we analyze the hemispherical variance ratios and compare these with simulated distributions. Secondly, working within a previously-proposed CMB bipolar modulation model, we constrain model parameters: the amplitude and the orientation of the modulation field as a function of various multipole bins. Finally, we select three ranges of multipoles leading to the most anomalous signals, and we process corresponding 100 Gaussian, random field (GRF) simulations, treated as observational data, to further test the statistical significance and robustness of the hemispherical power asymmetry. For our analysis we use the Internally-Linearly-Coadded (ILC) full sky map, and KQ75 cut-sky V channel, foregrounds reduced map of the WMAP five year data (V5). We constrain the modulation parameters using a generic maximum a posteriori method. In particular, we find differences in hemispherical power distribution, which when described in terms of a model with bipolar modulation field, exclude the field amplitude value of the isotropic model A=0 at confidence level of ~99.5% (~99.4%) in the multipole range l=[7,19] (l=[7,79]) in the V5 data, and at the confidence level ~99.9% in the multipole range l=[7,39] in the ILC5 data, with the best fit (modal PDF) values in these particular multipole ranges of A=0.21 (A=0.21) and A=0.15 respectively. However, we also point out that similar or larger significances (in terms of rejecting the isotropic model), and large best-fit modulation amplitudes are obtained in GRF simulations as well, which reduces the overall significance of the CMB power asymmetry down to only about 94% (95%) in the V5 data, in the range l=[7,19] (l=[7,79]).
24 pages, 10 figures; few typos corrected; published in JCAP
References in corpus (19)
- Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Temperature Analysis
- Hemispherical power asymmetry in the three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe sky maps
- Detection of primordial non-Gaussianity (fNL) in the WMAP 3-year data at above 99.5% confidence
- The non-Gaussian Cold Spot in the 3-year WMAP data
- Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features have a Future!
- The Axis of Evil revisited
- CMB multipole measurements in the presence of foregrounds
- Local Voids as the Origin of Large-angle Cosmic Microwave Background Anomalies: The Effect of a Cosmological Constant
- Testable polarization predictions for models of CMB isotropy anomalies
- Global universe anisotropy probed by the alignment of structures in the cosmic microwave background
- Testing Global Isotropy of Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Data: Temperature Analysis
- Alignment tests for low CMB multipoles
- Testing Isotropy of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
- A test of the Poincare dodecahedral space topology hypothesis with the WMAP CMB data
- A note on the large-angle anisotropies in the WMAP cut-sky maps
- Constraining Primordial Non-Gaussianities from the WMAP2 2-1 Cumulant Correlator Power Spectrum
- Testing Gaussianity on Archeops Data
- Real space tests of the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the WMAP CMB data
- Searching for non Gaussian signals in the BOOMERanG 2003 CMB maps
Cited by in corpus (14)
- Is the Observable Universe Consistent with the Cosmological Principle?
- Power asymmetry in WMAP and Planck temperature sky maps as measured by a local variance estimator
- Explaining Cosmological Anisotropy: Evidence for Causal Horizons from CMB data
- Signals of Statistical Anisotropy in WMAP Foreground-Cleaned Maps
- Needlet Bispectrum Asymmetries in the WMAP 5-year Data
- Direction dependence of the power spectrum and its effect on the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation
- Searching for non-Gaussianity in the WMAP data
- Can residuals of the Solar system foreground explain low multipole anomalies of the CMB ?
- Non-gaussianity in the foreground-reduced CMB maps
- Is the cold spot responsible for the CMB North-South asymmetry?
- Searching for planar signatures in WMAP
- Can Relic Superhorizon Inhomogeneities be Responsible for Large-Scale CMB Anomalies?
- Hemispherical Variance Anomaly and Reionization Optical Depth
- Testing Gaussianity in the WMAP data of OT foreground reduced map