Insufficiency of the Quantum State for Deducing Observational Probabilities
arXiv:0808.0722 · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.05.064
Abstract
It is usually assumed that the quantum state is sufficient for deducing all probabilities for a system. This may be true when there is a single observer, but it is not true in a universe large enough that there are many copies of an observer. Then the probability of an observation cannot be deduced simply from the quantum state (say as the expectation value of the projection operator for the observation, as in traditional quantum theory). One needs additional rules to get the probabilities. What these rules are is not logically deducible from the quantum state, so the quantum state itself is insufficient for deducing observational probabilities. This is the measure problem of cosmology.
4 pages, LaTeX, minor changes made in response to the referee's comments
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Excluding Black Hole Firewalls with Extreme Cosmic Censorship
- Technically natural dark energy from Lorentz breaking
- The Born Rule Dies
- Science in a Very Large Universe
- Cosmological Measures without Volume Weighting
- Consciousness and the Quantum
- Symmetric-Bounce Quantum State of the Universe
- Born's Rule Is Insufficient in a Large Universe
- Agnesi Weighting for the Measure Problem of Cosmology
- Possibilities for Probabilities
- Spacetime Average Density (SAD) Cosmological Measures
- Possible Anthropic Support for a Decaying Universe: A Cosmic Doomsday Argument
- Do Our Observations Depend upon the Quantum State of the Universe?