paper

The Dust Scattering Model Can Not Explain The Shallow X-ray Decay in GRB Afterglows

arXiv:0806.3541 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14223.x

Abstract

A dust scattering model was recently proposed to explain the shallow X-ray decay (plateau) observed prevalently in Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) early afterglows. In this model the plateau is the scattered prompt X-ray emission by the dust located close (about 10 to a few hundred pc) to the GRB site. In this paper we carefully investigate the model and find that the scattered emission undergoes strong spectral softening with time, due to the model's essential ingredient that harder X-ray photons have smaller scattering angle thus arrive earlier, while softer photons suffer larger angle scattering and arrive later. The model predicts a significant change, i.e., $Δ\b \sim 2 - 3$, in the X-ray spectral index from the beginning of the plateau toward the end of the plateau, while the observed data shows close to zero softening during the plateau and the plateau-to-normal transition phase. The scattering model predicts a big difference between the harder X-ray light curve and the softer X-ray light curve, i.e., the plateau in harder X-rays ends much earlier than in softer X-rays. This feature is not seen in the data. The large scattering optical depths of the dust required by the model imply strong extinction in optical, 10, which contradicts current findings of from optical and X-ray afterglow observations. We conclude that the dust scattering model can not explain the X-ray plateaus.

9 pages, 7 figures, MNRAS in press. Updated references. Added two paragraphs discussing the relation between A_v and X-ray scattering optical depth. Conclusion not changed

References in corpus (21)

Cited by in corpus (19)