most citedMeasuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: Cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level

7 citations

4 papers

cond-mat.str-el2023★ 4 cited

The magnetic exciton of EuS revealed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering

Lucia Amidani, Jonas J. Joos, Pieter Glatzel +1

We report the valence-to-core resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) of EuS measured at the L3 edge of Eu. The obtained data reveal two sets of excitations: one set is composed…

cs.DL2016★ 1 cited

Corrigendum to "Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters" [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]

A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Ronald Rousseaub +1

In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we cal…

cs.DL2016★ 7 cited

Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: Cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level

A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Loet Leydesdorff +1

When research groups are evaluated by an expert panel, it is an open question how one can determine the match between panel and research groups. In this paper, we outline two quant…

cs.DL2016★ 1 cited

A note and a correction on measuring cognitive distance in multiple dimensions

Ronald Rousseau, A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns +1

In a previous article (Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels, 2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was…