activity
20162025
most citedJournal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries

42 citations · 54 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.DL2025★ 1 cited

Comparing Disciplinary Classifications in SSH: Organizational, Channel-Based, and Text-Based Perspectives

Cristina Arhiliuc, Raf Guns, Tim C. E. Engels

This study investigates how different approaches to disciplinary classification represent the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in the Flemish VABB-SHW database. We compare orga…

cs.DL2022★ 2 cited

Towards indicating interdisciplinarity: Characterizing interdisciplinary knowledge flow

Hongyu Zhou, Raf Guns, Tim C. E. Engels

This study contributes to the recent discussions on indicating interdisciplinarity, i.e., going beyond catch-all metrics of interdisciplinarity. We propose a contextual framework t…

cs.DL2020★ 42 cited

Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries

Michal Petr, Tim C. E. Engels, Emanuel Kulczycki +4

This study compares publication pattern dynamics in the social sciences and humanities in five European countries. Three are Central and Eastern European countries that share a sim…

cs.DL2016★ 1 cited

Corrigendum to "Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters" [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]

A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Ronald Rousseaub +1

In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we cal…

cs.DL2016★ 7 cited

Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: Cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level

A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Loet Leydesdorff +1

When research groups are evaluated by an expert panel, it is an open question how one can determine the match between panel and research groups. In this paper, we outline two quant…

cs.DL2016★ 1 cited

A note and a correction on measuring cognitive distance in multiple dimensions

Ronald Rousseau, A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns +1

In a previous article (Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels, 2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was…