42 citations · 65 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for
8 papers
Comparing Disciplinary Classifications in SSH: Organizational, Channel-Based, and Text-Based Perspectives
Cristina Arhiliuc, Raf Guns, Tim C. E. Engels
This study investigates how different approaches to disciplinary classification represent the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in the Flemish VABB-SHW database. We compare orga…
Exact results for the order picking time distribution under return routing
Tim Engels, Ivo Adan, Onno Boxma +1
This paper derives exact expressions for the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the order picking time in single- and 2-block warehouses. We consider manual warehouses that deploy retu…
Towards indicating interdisciplinarity: Characterizing interdisciplinary knowledge flow
Hongyu Zhou, Raf Guns, Tim C. E. Engels
This study contributes to the recent discussions on indicating interdisciplinarity, i.e., going beyond catch-all metrics of interdisciplinarity. We propose a contextual framework t…
An exact analysis and comparison of manual picker routing heuristics
Tim Engels, Ivo Adan, Onno Boxma +1
This paper presents exact derivations of the first two moments of the total picking time in a warehouse for four routing heuristics, under the assumption of random storage. The ana…
Journal article publishing in the social sciences and humanities: a comparison of Web of Science coverage for five European countries
Michal Petr, Tim C. E. Engels, Emanuel Kulczycki +4
This study compares publication pattern dynamics in the social sciences and humanities in five European countries. Three are Central and Eastern European countries that share a sim…
Corrigendum to "Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters" [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]
A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Ronald Rousseaub +1
In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we cal…
Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: Cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level
A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns, Loet Leydesdorff +1
When research groups are evaluated by an expert panel, it is an open question how one can determine the match between panel and research groups. In this paper, we outline two quant…
A note and a correction on measuring cognitive distance in multiple dimensions
Ronald Rousseau, A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns +1
In a previous article (Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels, 2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was…