Université de Montréal

researchers with a paper here

Counting papers with at most 25 authors, so collaboration author lists do not stand in for the people here.

A. Moffat3 profiles179 · h 45
L. Vinet139 · h 45
Yoshua Bengio138 · h 212
D. London109 · h 42
R. Doyon93 · h 65
É. Artigau84 · h 43
D. Lafrèniere82 · h 53
P. Winternitz2 profiles80 · h 64
R. Kuschnig79 · h 39
S. Rucinski73 · h 49
A. Zhedanov72 · h 43
G. Aad71 · h 0

collaborating institutions

Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFR2k papers
University of British ColumbiaCA1.9k papers
McGill UniversityCA1.9k papers
University of VictoriaCA1.8k papers
University of California, Santa CruzUS1.7k papers
Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryGB1.7k papers
University of ManchesterGB1.7k papers
Queen Mary University of LondonGB1.7k papers
University of PisaIT1.6k papers
University of EdinburghGB1.6k papers
University of BirminghamGB1.6k papers
Heidelberg UniversityDE1.6k papers

Showing 2016 · hep-phShow all

2 papers · 2 filters

hep-ph2016★ 173 cited

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_{K}$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$ Puzzles: a Model Analysis

Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya, Alakabha Datta, Jean-Pascal Guévin +2

$R_{K}$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$ are two $B$ -decay measurements that presently exhibit discrepancies with the SM. Recently, using an effective field theory approach, it was demonstrated tha…

hep-ph2016★ 1 cited

Is there really a $W \to τ ν$ puzzle?

Bhubanjyoti Bhattacharya, Alakabha Datta, David London

According to the Particle Data Group, the measurements of $B (W^{+} \to τ^{+} ν_{τ})$ and $B (W^{+} \to ℓ^{+} ν_{ℓ})$ ( $ℓ = e, μ$ ) disagree with one another at the $2.3 σ$ l…

Simultaneous Explanation of the RK​ and RD(∗)​ Puzzles: a Model Analysis

Is there really a W→τν puzzle?

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_{K}$ and $R_{D^{(*)}}$ Puzzles: a Model Analysis

Is there really a $W \to τ ν$ puzzle?