activity
20162026
most citedHuman-in-the-Loop Schema Induction

8 citations · 26 across the 13 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

13 papers

cs.AI2026

AI Planning Framework for LLM-Based Web Agents

Orit Shahnovsky, Rotem Dror

Developing autonomous agents for web-based tasks is a core challenge in AI. While Large Language Model (LLM) agents can interpret complex user requests, they often operate as black…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

The Alternative Annotator Test for LLM-as-a-Judge: How to Statistically Justify Replacing Human Annotators with LLMs

Nitay Calderon, Roi Reichart, Rotem Dror

The "LLM-as-an-annotator" and "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigms employ Large Language Models (LLMs) as annotators, judges, and evaluators in tasks traditionally performed by humans. LLM a…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluation

Moran Mizrahi, Guy Kaplan, Dan Malkin +3

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of various evaluation benchmarks. These benchmarks typically rely on a single instruction template for e…

cs.CL2023

The Eval4NLP 2023 Shared Task on Prompting Large Language Models as Explainable Metrics

Christoph Leiter, Juri Opitz, Daniel Deutsch +3

With an increasing number of parameters and pre-training data, generative large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities to solve tasks with minimal or no task-rel…

cs.HC2023★ 8 cited

Human-in-the-Loop Schema Induction

Tianyi Zhang, Isaac Tham, Zhaoyi Hou +12

Schema induction builds a graph representation explaining how events unfold in a scenario. Existing approaches have been based on information retrieval (IR) and information extract…

cs.CL2022★ 2 cited

On the Limitations of Reference-Free Evaluations of Generated Text

Daniel Deutsch, Rotem Dror, Dan Roth

There is significant interest in developing evaluation metrics which accurately estimate the quality of generated text without the aid of a human-written reference text, which can…