1k citations · 11.6k across the 167 of their papers we have counts for
18 papers · 1 filter
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Clustering Redshifts -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions with redMaGiC and BOSS/eBOSS
M. Gatti, G. Giannini, G. M. Bernstein +94
We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) weak lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. In particular, we cross-…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Calibration of Lens Sample Redshift Distributions using Clustering Redshifts with BOSS/eBOSS
R. Cawthon, J. Elvin-Poole, A. Porredon +83
We present clustering redshift measurements for Dark Energy Survey (DES) lens sample galaxies to be used in weak gravitational lensing and galaxy clustering studies. To perform thi…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Deep Field Optical + Near-Infrared Images and Catalogue
W. G. Hartley, A. Choi, A. Amon +115
We describe the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Deep Fields, a set of images and associated multi-wavelength catalogue () built from Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and Visible and…
Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
P. Lemos, M. Raveri, A. Campos +103
Quantifying tensions -- inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments -- has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analys…
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho +109
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansat…
DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations
N. MacCrann, M. R. Becker, J. McCullough +93
As the statistical power of galaxy weak lensing reaches percent level precision, large, realistic and robust simulations are required to calibrate observational systematics, especi…