activity
20162023
most citedExplainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences

215 citations · 535 across the 22 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2021Show all

9 papers · 1 filter

cs.AI2021

Efficient Multi-agent Epistemic Planning: Teaching Planners About Nested Belief

Christian Muise, Vaishak Belle, Paolo Felli +4

Many AI applications involve the interaction of multiple autonomous agents, requiring those agents to reason about their own beliefs, as well as those of other agents. However, pla…

cs.MA2021

Modelling Strategic Deceptive Planning in Adversarial Multi-Agent Systems

Lyndon Benke, Michael Papasimeon, Tim Miller

Deception is virtually ubiquitous in warfare, and should be a central consideration for military operations research. However, studies of agent behaviour in simulated operations ha…

cs.AI2021

Collaborative Human-Agent Planning for Resilience

Ronal Singh, Tim Miller, Darryn Reid

Intelligent agents powered by AI planning assist people in complex scenarios, such as managing teams of semi-autonomous vehicles. However, AI planning models may be incomplete, lea…

cs.LG2021★ 2 cited

LEx: A Framework for Operationalising Layers of Machine Learning Explanations

Ronal Singh, Upol Ehsan, Marc Cheong +2

Several social factors impact how people respond to AI explanations used to justify AI decisions affecting them personally. In this position paper, we define a framework called the…

cs.CY2021

Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions

Henrietta Lyons, Eduardo Velloso, Tim Miller

As the use of algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making increases, the ability to contest algorithmic decisions is being recognised as an important safeguard for individua…

cs.HC2021★ 1 cited

Fair and Responsible AI: A Focus on the Ability to Contest

Henrietta Lyons, Eduardo Velloso, Tim Miller

As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in high-stakes decision-making increases, the ability to contest such decisions is being recognised in AI ethics guidelines as an importa…

cs.HC2021

Designing for Contestation: Insights from Administrative Law

Henrietta Lyons, Eduardo Velloso, Tim Miller

A paper presented at the Workshop on Contestability in Algorithmic Systems at CSCW 2019. Challenging algorithmic decisions is important to decision subjects, yet numerous factors c…

cs.LG2021★ 9 cited

Deceptive Reinforcement Learning for Privacy-Preserving Planning

Zhengshang Liu, Yue Yang, Tim Miller +1

In this paper, we study the problem of deceptive reinforcement learning to preserve the privacy of a reward function. Reinforcement learning is the problem of finding a behaviour p…

cs.LG2021★ 5 cited

Directive Explanations for Actionable Explainability in Machine Learning Applications

Ronal Singh, Paul Dourish, Piers Howe +4

This paper investigates the prospects of using directive explanations to assist people in achieving recourse of machine learning decisions. Directive explanations list which specif…