most citedAre we measuring trust correctly in explainability, interpretability, and transparency research?

13 citations · 31 across the 6 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.AI2023★ 2 cited

Deceptive Reinforcement Learning in Model-Free Domains

Alan Lewis, Tim Miller

This paper investigates deceptive reinforcement learning for privacy preservation in model-free and continuous action space domains. In reinforcement learning, the reward function…

cs.AI2023★ 11 cited

Explainable AI is Dead, Long Live Explainable AI! Hypothesis-driven decision support

Tim Miller

In this paper, we argue for a paradigm shift from the current model of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), which may be counter-productive to better human decision making. I…

cs.AI2023

Explaining Model Confidence Using Counterfactuals

Thao Le, Tim Miller, Ronal Singh +1

Displaying confidence scores in human-AI interaction has been shown to help build trust between humans and AI systems. However, most existing research uses only the confidence scor…

cs.AI2023★ 1 cited

Explainable Goal Recognition: A Framework Based on Weight of Evidence

Abeer Alshehri, Tim Miller, Mor Vered

We introduce and evaluate an eXplainable Goal Recognition (XGR) model that uses the Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework to explain goal recognition problems. Our model provides huma…

cs.HC2022★ 13 cited

Are we measuring trust correctly in explainability, interpretability, and transparency research?

Tim Miller

This paper presents an argument for why we are not measuring trust sufficiently in explainability, interpretability, and transparency research. Most studies ask participants to com…

cs.LG2022★ 4 cited

Improving Model Understanding and Trust with Counterfactual Explanations of Model Confidence

Thao Le, Tim Miller, Ronal Singh +1

In this paper, we show that counterfactual explanations of confidence scores help users better understand and better trust an AI model's prediction in human-subject studies. Showin…