activity
20132026
most citedBeyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models

565 citations · 1.2k across the 68 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2020 · cs.CLShow all

7 papers · 2 filters

cs.CL2020★ 7 cited

ParsiNLU: A Suite of Language Understanding Challenges for Persian

Daniel Khashabi, Arman Cohan, Siamak Shakeri +22

Despite the progress made in recent years in addressing natural language understanding (NLU) challenges, the majority of this progress remains to be concentrated on resource-rich l…

cs.CL2020

UnQovering Stereotyping Biases via Underspecified Questions

Tao Li, Tushar Khot, Daniel Khashabi +2

While language embeddings have been shown to have stereotyping biases, how these biases affect downstream question answering (QA) models remains unexplored. We present UNQOVER, a g…

cs.CL2020

Text Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Tasks in the Language of Existing Models

Tushar Khot, Daniel Khashabi, Kyle Richardson +2

We propose a general framework called Text Modular Networks(TMNs) for building interpretable systems that learn to solve complex tasks by decomposing them into simpler ones solvabl…

cs.CL2020★ 12 cited

Temporal Common Sense Acquisition with Minimal Supervision

Ben Zhou, Qiang Ning, Daniel Khashabi +1

Temporal common sense (e.g., duration and frequency of events) is crucial for understanding natural language. However, its acquisition is challenging, partly because such informati…

cs.CL2020

UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA System

Daniel Khashabi, Sewon Min, Tushar Khot +4

Question answering (QA) tasks have been posed using a variety of formats, such as extractive span selection, multiple choice, etc. This has led to format-specialized models, and ev…

cs.CL2020★ 1 cited

More Bang for Your Buck: Natural Perturbation for Robust Question Answering

Daniel Khashabi, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal

While recent models have achieved human-level scores on many NLP datasets, we observe that they are considerably sensitive to small changes in input. As an alternative to the stand…

cs.CL2020★ 44 cited

Evaluating Models' Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets

Matt Gardner, Yoav Artzi, Victoria Basmova +23

Standard test sets for supervised learning evaluate in-distribution generalization. Unfortunately, when a dataset has systematic gaps (e.g., annotation artifacts), these evaluation…