activity
20132019
most citedOnline Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence

38 citations · 86 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.HCShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.HC2015★ 13 cited

Design for Online Deliberative Processes and Technologies: Towards a Multidisciplinary Research Agenda

Lu Xiao, Weiyu Zhang, Anna Przybylska +4

There has been rapidly growing interest in studying and designing online deliberative processes and technologies. This SIG aims at providing a venue for continuous and constructive…

cs.HC2013★ 38 cited

Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence

Todd Davies, Reid Chandler

This chapter reviews empirical evidence bearing on the design of online forums for deliberative civic engagement. Dimensions of design are defined for different aspects of the deli…

cs.HC2013★ 12 cited

An Online Environment for Democratic Deliberation: Motivations, Principles, and Design

Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran +4

We have created a platform for online deliberation called Deme (which rhymes with 'team'). Deme is designed to allow groups of people to engage in collaborative drafting, focused d…

cs.HC2013

Displaying Asynchronous Reactions to a Document: Two Goals and a Design

Todd Davies, Benjamin Newman, Brendan O'Connor +2

We describe and motivate three goals for the screen display of asynchronous text deliberation pertaining to a document: (1) visibility of relationships between comments and the tex…

cs.HC2013

"Groupware for Groups": Problem-Driven Design in Deme

Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran +1

Design choices can be clarified when group interaction software is directed at solving the interaction needs of particular groups that pre-date the groupware. We describe an exampl…