most citedOnline Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence

38 citations · 59 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

6 papers

cs.HC201338 cited

Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence

Todd Davies, Reid Chandler

This chapter reviews empirical evidence bearing on the design of online forums for deliberative civic engagement. Dimensions of design are defined for different aspects of the deli…

cs.SI20138 cited

Design Features for the Social Web: The Architecture of Deme

Todd Davies, Mike D. Mintz

We characterize the "social Web" and argue for several features that are desirable for users of socially oriented web applications. We describe the architecture of Deme, a web cont…

cs.HC201312 cited

An Online Environment for Democratic Deliberation: Motivations, Principles, and Design

Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran +4

We have created a platform for online deliberation called Deme (which rhymes with 'team'). Deme is designed to allow groups of people to engage in collaborative drafting, focused d…

cs.HC2013

Displaying Asynchronous Reactions to a Document: Two Goals and a Design

Todd Davies, Benjamin Newman, Brendan O'Connor +2

We describe and motivate three goals for the screen display of asynchronous text deliberation pertaining to a document: (1) visibility of relationships between comments and the tex…

cs.HC2013

"Groupware for Groups": Problem-Driven Design in Deme

Todd Davies, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran +1

Design choices can be clarified when group interaction software is directed at solving the interaction needs of particular groups that pre-date the groupware. We describe an exampl…

cs.SI20131 cited

Relational Access Control with Bivalent Permissions in a Social Web/Collaboration Architecture

Todd Davies, Mike D. Mintz

We describe an access control model that has been implemented in the web content management framework "Deme" (which rhymes with "team"). Access control in Deme is an example of wha…