18 papers
Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI
Xiang Yin, Tim Miller, Nico Potyka +2
Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together…
Evaluating LLM-Driven Summarisation of Parliamentary Debates with Computational Argumentation
Eoghan Cunningham, Derek Greene, James Cross +1
Understanding how policy is debated and justified in parliament is a fundamental aspect of the democratic process. However, the volume and complexity of such debates mean that outs…
From User Preferences to Base Score Extraction Functions in Gradual Argumentation (with Appendix)
Aniol Civit, Antonio Rago, Antonio Andriella +2
Gradual argumentation is a field of symbolic AI which is attracting attention for its ability to support transparent and contestable AI systems. It is considered a useful tool in d…
Argumentative Human-AI Decision-Making: Toward AI Agents That Reason With Us, Not For Us
Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni +1
Computational argumentation offers formal frameworks for transparent, verifiable reasoning but has traditionally been limited by its reliance on domain-specific information and ext…
Synthesising Counterfactual Explanations via Label-Conditional Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoders
Junqi Jiang, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago +1
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) provide recourse recommendations for individuals affected by algorithmic decisions. A key challenge is generating CEs that are robust against vari…
Retrieval- and Argumentation-Enhanced Multi-Agent LLMs for Judgmental Forecasting (Extended Version with Supplementary Material)
Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Judgmental forecasting is the task of making predictions about future events based on human judgment. This task can be seen as a form of claim verification, where the claim corresp…