13 papers · 1 filter
Towards an Argumentative Foundation for Evaluative AI
Xiang Yin, Tim Miller, Nico Potyka +2
Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together…
From User Preferences to Base Score Extraction Functions in Gradual Argumentation (with Appendix)
Aniol Civit, Antonio Rago, Antonio Andriella +2
Gradual argumentation is a field of symbolic AI which is attracting attention for its ability to support transparent and contestable AI systems. It is considered a useful tool in d…
Argumentative Human-AI Decision-Making: Toward AI Agents That Reason With Us, Not For Us
Stylianos Loukas Vasileiou, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni +1
Computational argumentation offers formal frameworks for transparent, verifiable reasoning but has traditionally been limited by its reliance on domain-specific information and ext…
Retrieval- and Argumentation-Enhanced Multi-Agent LLMs for Judgmental Forecasting (Extended Version with Supplementary Material)
Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Judgmental forecasting is the task of making predictions about future events based on human judgment. This task can be seen as a form of claim verification, where the claim corresp…
Argumentatively Coherent Judgmental Forecasting
Deniz Gorur, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
Judgmental forecasting employs human opinions to make predictions about future events, rather than exclusively historical data as in quantitative forecasting. When these opinions f…
Exploring the Effect of Explanation Content and Format on User Comprehension and Trust in Healthcare
Antonio Rago, Bence Palfi, Purin Sukpanichnant +5
AI-driven tools for healthcare are widely acknowledged as potentially beneficial to health practitioners and patients, e.g. the QCancer regression tool for cancer risk prediction.…