6 citations · 19 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for
Showing 2011 · cs.DLShow all
3 papers · 2 filters
cs.DL2011
A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators
Loet Leydesdorff, Tobias Opthof
Citation distributions are so skewed that using the mean or any other central tendency measure is ill-advised. Unlike G. Prathap's scalar measures (Energy, Exergy, and Entropy or E…
cs.DL2011★ 4 cited
Citation analysis cannot legitimate the strategic selection of excellence
Tobias Opthof, Loet Leydesdorff
In reaction to a previous critique(Opthof & Leydesdorff, 2010), the Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in Leiden proposed to change their old "crown" indicator in cit…
cs.DL2011
Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz +1
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations but on percentile ranks. Citation distributions are-as a rule-highly skewed and s…