4 citations · 4 across the 2 of their papers we have counts for
3 papers
cs.DL2011★ 4 cited
Citation analysis cannot legitimate the strategic selection of excellence
Tobias Opthof, Loet Leydesdorff
In reaction to a previous critique(Opthof & Leydesdorff, 2010), the Center for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in Leiden proposed to change their old "crown" indicator in cit…
cs.DL2011
Turning the tables in citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz +1
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations but on percentile ranks. Citation distributions are-as a rule-highly skewed and s…
cs.DL2010
Remaining problems with the "New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS
Loet Leydesdorff, Tobias Opthof
In their article, entitled "Towards a new crown indicator: some theoretical considerations," Waltman et al. (2010; at arXiv:1003.2167) show that the "old crown indicator" of CWTS i…