1 citations · 1 across the 4 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers
A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review
Chenguang Wang, Ming Li, Chengrui Fan +4
AI reviewers can assign different judgments to manuscripts that report the same science in different wording, potentially rewarding rhetorical optimization over scientific improvem…
Representing Visual Evidence for Item Difficulty Prediction: Visual Textualization and Image-Native Modeling
Han Chen, Ming Li, Hong Jiao +1
Predicting item difficulty from content can provide an initial estimate for newly developed questions before sufficient student responses are available. Existing approaches typical…
LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment
Han Chen, Ming Li, Chenguang Wang +4
Existing work on LLM-based educational assessment has focused largely on item difficulty, but difficulty alone does not indicate whether an item meaningfully distinguishes higher-…
Can LLMs Estimate Student Struggles? Human-AI Difficulty Alignment with Proficiency Simulation for Item Difficulty Prediction
Ming Li, Han Chen, Yunze Xiao +3
Accurate estimation of item (question or task) difficulty is critical for educational assessment but suffers from the cold start problem. While Large Language Models demonstrate su…
RuleR: Improving LLM Controllability by Rule-based Data Recycling
Ming Li, Han Chen, Chenguang Wang +3
Large language models (LLMs) still lack delicate controllability over their responses, which is critical to enhancing their performance and the user experience. However, curating s…