most citedHidden flaws behind expert-level accuracy of multimodal GPT-4 vision in medicine

134 citations · 210 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.CLShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.CL2026

Towards AI-Assisted Clinical Trial Matching: Practical Considerations, Multicenter Evaluation, and Real-World Deployment

Yin Fang, Qiao Jin, Shubo Tian +24

Clinical trials are essential for evidence-based medicine and drug development, but many fail because of insufficient patient enrollment. Although there is growing interest in usin…

cs.CL2026

MedHopQA: A Disease-Centered Multi-Hop Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based Biomedical Question Answering

Rezarta Islamaj, Robert Leaman, Joey Chan +13

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) in the biomedical domain requires benchmarks that can distinguish reasoning from pattern matching and remain discriminative as model capabil…

cs.CL2024

MedCalc-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models for Medical Calculations

Nikhil Khandekar, Qiao Jin, Guangzhi Xiong +14

As opposed to evaluating computation and logic-based reasoning, current benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medicine are primarily focused on question-answeri…

cs.CL2024★ 5 cited

Leveraging Professional Radiologists' Expertise to Enhance LLMs' Evaluation for Radiology Reports

Qingqing Zhu, Xiuying Chen, Qiao Jin +6

In radiology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly advanced report generation, but automatic evaluation of these AI-produced reports remains challenging. Current metrics,…

cs.CL2024★ 56 cited

Quality of Answers of Generative Large Language Models vs Peer Patients for Interpreting Lab Test Results for Lay Patients: Evaluation Study

Zhe He, Balu Bhasuran, Qiao Jin +6

Lab results are often confusing and hard to understand. Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have opened a promising avenue for patients to get their questions answered. We…