activity
20232026
most citedFrom Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification

3 citations · 3 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL2026

Variation is the Norm: Embracing Sociolinguistics in NLP

Anne-Marie Lutgen, Alistair Plum, Verena Blaschke +2

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), variation is typically seen as noise and "normalised away" before processing, even though it is an integral part of language. Conversely, stud…

cs.CL2025

From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLP

Shanshan Xu, Santosh T. Y. S. S, Barbara Plank

Human Label Variation (HLV) refers to legitimate disagreement in annotation that reflects the diversity of human perspectives rather than mere error. Long treated in NLP as noise t…

cs.CL2025

Better Aligned with Survey Respondents or Training Data? Unveiling Political Leanings of LLMs on U.S. Supreme Court Cases

Shanshan Xu, T. Y. S. S Santosh, Yanai Elazar +3

Recent works have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) have a tendency to memorize patterns and biases present in their training data, raising important questions about how such…

cs.CL2024

Through the Lens of Split Vote: Exploring Disagreement, Difficulty and Calibration in Legal Case Outcome Classification

Shanshan Xu, T. Y. S. S Santosh, Oana Ichim +2

In legal decisions, split votes (SV) occur when judges cannot reach a unanimous decision, posing a difficulty for lawyers who must navigate diverse legal arguments and opinions. In…

cs.CL2023★ 3 cited

From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification

Shanshan Xu, T. Y. S. S Santosh, Oana Ichim +3

In legal NLP, Case Outcome Classification (COC) must not only be accurate but also trustworthy and explainable. Existing work in explainable COC has been limited to annotations by…