51 citations · 85 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Inducing language models to assert their own consciousness restores human beliefs and values
Junsol Kim, Winnie Street, Roberta Rocca +4
Aligning large language models to prevent them attributing consciousness to themselves inadvertently alters their representations of mindedness in other entities alongside human be…
Beyond Sally-Anne: Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs using Epistemic Schelling Points
Roberta Rocca, Sami Boukortt, Geoff Keeling +1
Text-based evaluations of Theory of Mind (ToM) in Large Language Models (LLMs) often involve cognitive tests akin to the Sally-Anne task that can be gamed due to exposure to releva…
Theory of Mind and Persuasion Beyond Conversation: Assessing the Capacity of LLMs to Induce Belief States via Planning and Action
Ben Slater, Matteo G. Mecattaf, Lucy G. Cheke +2
Theory of Mind (ToM) benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on passive question-answering formats, but the deployment of LLMs in increasingly agentic and autono…
Theory of Mind and Self-Attributions of Mentality are Dissociable in LLMs
Junsol Kim, Winnie Street, Roberta Rocca +4
Safety fine-tuning in Large Language Models (LLMs) seeks to suppress potentially harmful forms of mind-attribution such as models asserting their own consciousness or claiming to e…
Can LLMs make trade-offs involving stipulated pain and pleasure states?
Geoff Keeling, Winnie Street, Martyna Stachaczyk +7
Pleasure and pain play an important role in human decision making by providing a common currency for resolving motivational conflicts. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can genera…