activity
20242026
most citedSpurious Correlations in Concept Drift: Can Explanatory Interaction Help?

1 citations · 1 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

5 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

When Are Concept Bottleneck Model Explanations Faithful and Compact?

Stefano Teso, Emanuele Marconato, Steve Azzolin +1

Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) are neural classifiers that allow to explain their decisions via high-level concepts, potentially enabling understanding, steering and debugging. H…

cs.LG2026

Concise and Logically Consistent Conformal Sets for Neuro-Symbolic Concept-Based Models

Samuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Andrea Pugnana +2

Neuro-Symbolic Concept-based Models (NeSy-CBMs) are a family of architectures that integrate neural networks with symbolic reasoning for enhanced reliability in high-stakes applica…

cs.LG2025

Knowing What You Cannot Explain: Learning to Reject Low-Quality Explanations

Luca Stradiotti, Dario Pesenti, Stefano Teso +1

Learning to Reject (LtR) frameworks allow ML models to abstain from uncertain predictions and promote user trust. However, since current LtR strategies focus solely on predictive p…

cs.LG2025

If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?

Nicola Debole, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini +3

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are neural networks designed to conjoin high performance with ante-hoc interpretability. CBMs work by first mapping inputs (e.g., images) to high-l…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Spurious Correlations in Concept Drift: Can Explanatory Interaction Help?

Cristiana Lalletti, Stefano Teso

Long-running machine learning models face the issue of concept drift (CD), whereby the data distribution changes over time, compromising prediction performance. Updating the model…