activity
20242026
most citedSpurious Correlations in Concept Drift: Can Explanatory Interaction Help?

1 citations · 1 across the 8 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

10 papers

cs.LG2026

When Are Concept Bottleneck Model Explanations Faithful and Compact?

Stefano Teso, Emanuele Marconato, Steve Azzolin +1

Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) are neural classifiers that allow to explain their decisions via high-level concepts, potentially enabling understanding, steering and debugging. H…

cs.HC2026

Too Much of the Same: From Algorithmic to Human Bias in Learning to Defer

Dario Pesenti, Alessandro Bogani, Stefano Teso +1

Learning to Defer (LtD) extends supervised learning by allowing a Machine Learning (ML) model to defer harder or less confident decisions to a human expert. Despite being geared fo…

cs.CV2026

Concepts Worth Having: Refining VLM-Guided Concept Bottleneck Models with Minimal Annotations

Nicola Debole, Andrea Passerini, Stefano Teso +2

Concept-bottleneck models (CBMs) are neural classifiers that compute predictions from high-level concepts extracted from the input. CBMs ensure stakeholders can understand the conc…

cs.LG2026

Concise and Logically Consistent Conformal Sets for Neuro-Symbolic Concept-Based Models

Samuele Bortolotti, Emanuele Marconato, Andrea Pugnana +2

Neuro-Symbolic Concept-based Models (NeSy-CBMs) are a family of architectures that integrate neural networks with symbolic reasoning for enhanced reliability in high-stakes applica…

cs.AI2026

Hybrid Decision Making via Conformal VLM-generated Guidance

Debodeep Banerjee, Burcu Sayin, Stefano Teso +1

Building on recent advances in AI, hybrid decision making (HDM) holds the promise of improving human decision quality and reducing cognitive load. We work in the context of learnin…

cs.AI2025

Human Cognitive Biases in Explanation-Based Interaction: The Case of Within and Between Session Order Effect

Dario Pesenti, Alessandro Bogani, Katya Tentori +1

Explanatory Interactive Learning (XIL) is a powerful interactive learning framework designed to enable users to customize and correct AI models by interacting with their explanatio…

cs.LG2025

Knowing What You Cannot Explain: Learning to Reject Low-Quality Explanations

Luca Stradiotti, Dario Pesenti, Stefano Teso +1

Learning to Reject (LtR) frameworks allow ML models to abstain from uncertain predictions and promote user trust. However, since current LtR strategies focus solely on predictive p…

cs.CV2025

Personalized Interpretability -- Interactive Alignment of Prototypical Parts Networks

Tomasz Michalski, Adam Wróbel, Andrea Bontempelli +6

Concept-based interpretable neural networks have gained significant attention due to their intuitive and easy-to-understand explanations based on case-based reasoning, such as "thi…

cs.LG2025

If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?

Nicola Debole, Pietro Barbiero, Francesco Giannini +3

Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are neural networks designed to conjoin high performance with ante-hoc interpretability. CBMs work by first mapping inputs (e.g., images) to high-l…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Spurious Correlations in Concept Drift: Can Explanatory Interaction Help?

Cristiana Lalletti, Stefano Teso

Long-running machine learning models face the issue of concept drift (CD), whereby the data distribution changes over time, compromising prediction performance. Updating the model…