activity
20242026
collaborators

11 papers

cs.AI2026

Can AI Agents Synthesize Scientific Conclusions?

Hayoung Jung, Pedro Viana Diniz, José Reinaldo Corrêa Roveda +5

Scientific AI agents increasingly retrieve evidence, reason across sources, and synthesize conclusions used in consequential decisions. Yet, their ability to do so in high-stakes d…

cs.CV2026

WorldBench: A Challenging and Visually Diverse Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark

Yida Yin, Harish Krishnakumar, Chung Peng Lee +9

In real-world applications, models are expected to perform reliably across diverse settings. Yet, many existing multimodal benchmarks expand task types without capturing the visual…

cs.CY2026

Measuring Validity in LLM-based Resume Screening

Jane Castleman, Zeyu Shen, Blossom Metevier +2

Resume screening is perceived as a particularly suitable task for LLMs given their ability to analyze natural language; thus many entities rely on general purpose LLMs without furt…

cs.LG2026

The Geometry of Alignment Collapse: When Fine-Tuning Breaks Safety

Max Springer, Chung Peng Lee, Blossom Metevier +5

Fine-tuning aligned language models on benign tasks unpredictably degrades safety guardrails, even when training data contains no harmful content and developers have no adversarial…

cs.LG2025

FrontierCS: Evolving Challenges for Evolving Intelligence

Qiuyang Mang, Wenhao Chai, Zhifei Li +48

We introduce FrontierCS, a benchmark of 156 open-ended problems across diverse areas of computer science, designed and reviewed by experts, including CS PhDs and top-tier competiti…

cs.CY2025

An External Fairness Evaluation of LinkedIn Talent Search

Tina Behzad, Siddartha Devic, Vatsal Sharan +2

We conduct an independent, third-party audit for bias of LinkedIn's Talent Search ranking system, focusing on potential ranking bias across two attributes: gender and race. To do s…

cs.SE2025

AutoCode: LLMs as Problem Setters for Competitive Programming

Shang Zhou, Zihan Zheng, Kaiyuan Liu +18

Writing competitive programming problems is exacting. Authors must: set constraints, input distributions, and edge cases that rule out shortcuts; target specific algorithms (e.g.,…

cs.SE2025

LiveCodeBench Pro: How Do Olympiad Medalists Judge LLMs in Competitive Programming?

Zihan Zheng, Zerui Cheng, Zeyu Shen +16

Recent reports claim that large language models (LLMs) now outperform elite humans in competitive programming. Drawing on knowledge from a group of medalists in international algor…

cs.CY2025

Adultification Bias in LLMs and Text-to-Image Models

Jane Castleman, Aleksandra Korolova

The rapid adoption of generative AI models in domains such as education, policing, and social media raises significant concerns about potential bias and safety issues, particularly…

cs.CY2024

Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems

Jane Castleman, Aleksandra Korolova

Recently, Meta has shifted towards AI-mediated ad targeting mechanisms that do not require advertisers to provide detailed targeting criteria, likely driven by excitement over AI c…

cs.LG2024

Stability and Multigroup Fairness in Ranking with Uncertain Predictions

Siddartha Devic, Aleksandra Korolova, David Kempe +1

Rankings are ubiquitous across many applications, from search engines to hiring committees. In practice, many rankings are derived from the output of predictors. However, when pred…