6 papers · 1 filter
Simulated Control Evals
Jeffrey Olmo, David Zhang, Tyler Tracy
Control evaluations measure whether safeguards can prevent an AI model from causing undesired outcomes even when it is intentionally trying to do so. These evaluations typically us…
Code Monitor Red Teaming for Public-Test-Passing Code
Junchi Liao, Jiawen Deng, Fuji Ren
Visible tests are a common gate for LLM-generated code, but passing them does not certify specification correctness. We study a deployment-like monitoring problem: after code has p…
Attack Selection in Agentic AI Control Evaluations Meaningfully Decreases Safety
Catherine Ge-Wang, Tyler Crosse, Benjamin Hadad +3
An attacker that strategically chooses when to attack is much harder to catch than one that attacks indiscriminately. AI control is a safety framework for deploying capable but unt…
Evaluating Control Protocols for Untrusted AI Agents
Jon Kutasov, Chloe Loughridge, Yuqi Sun +4
As AI systems become more capable and widely deployed as agents, ensuring their safe operation becomes critical. AI control offers one approach to mitigating the risk from untruste…
Optimizing AI Agent Attacks With Synthetic Data
Chloe Loughridge, Paul Colognese, Avery Griffin +3
As AI deployments become more complex and high-stakes, it becomes increasingly important to be able to estimate their risk. AI control is one framework for doing so. However, good…
SHADE-Arena: Evaluating Sabotage and Monitoring in LLM Agents
Jonathan Kutasov, Yuqi Sun, Paul Colognese +9
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in complex and long horizon settings, it is critical to evaluate their ability to sabotage users by p…