3 citations · 6 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for
3 papers · 1 filter
Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences
Zahra Ashktorab, Michael Desmond, Qian Pan +7
Evaluation of large language model (LLM) outputs requires users to make critical judgments about the best outputs across various configurations. This process is costly and takes ti…
Facilitating Human-LLM Collaboration through Factuality Scores and Source Attributions
Hyo Jin Do, Rachel Ostrand, Justin D. Weisz +5
While humans increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs), they are susceptible to generating inaccurate or false information, also known as "hallucinations". Technical advanc…
Multi-Level Explanations for Generative Language Models
Lucas Monteiro Paes, Dennis Wei, Hyo Jin Do +8
Despite the increasing use of large language models (LLMs) for context-grounded tasks like summarization and question-answering, understanding what makes an LLM produce a certain r…