3 citations · 6 across the 10 of their papers we have counts for
10 papers
MultEval: Supporting Collaborative Alignment for LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation Criteria
Charles Chiang, Simret Gebreegziabher, Annalisa Szymanski +6
LLM-as-a-judge approaches have emerged as a scalable solution for evaluating model behaviors, yet they rely on evaluation criteria often created by a single individual, embedding t…
"Better Ask for Forgiveness than Permission": Practices and Policies of AI Disclosure in Freelance Work
Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Senya Wong, Baixiao Chen +2
The growing use of AI applications among freelance workers is reshaping trust and relationships with clients. This paper investigates how both workers and clients perceive AI use a…
The Behavioral Fabric of LLM-Powered GUI Agents: Human Values and Interaction Outcomes
Simret Araya Gebreegziabher, Yukun Yang, Charles Chiang +7
Large Language Model (LLM)-powered web GUI agents are increasingly automating everyday online tasks. Despite their popularity, little is known about how users' preferences and valu…
Generate, Evaluate, Iterate: Synthetic Data for Human-in-the-Loop Refinement of LLM Judges
Hyo Jin Do, Zahra Ashktorab, Jasmina Gajcin +5
The LLM-as-a-judge paradigm enables flexible, user-defined evaluation, but its effectiveness is often limited by the scarcity of diverse, representative data for refining criteria.…
Hide or Highlight: Understanding the Impact of Factuality Expression on User Trust
Hyo Jin Do, Werner Geyer
Large language models are known to produce outputs that are plausible but factually incorrect. To prevent people from making erroneous decisions by blindly trusting AI, researchers…
Highlight All the Phrases: Enhancing LLM Transparency through Visual Factuality Indicators
Hyo Jin Do, Rachel Ostrand, Werner Geyer +3
Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to generating inaccurate or false information, often referred to as "hallucinations" or "confabulations." While several technical advan…
EvalAssist: A Human-Centered Tool for LLM-as-a-Judge
Zahra Ashktorab, Werner Geyer, Michael Desmond +6
With the broad availability of large language models and their ability to generate vast outputs using varied prompts and configurations, determining the best output for a given tas…
Aligning Human and LLM Judgments: Insights from EvalAssist on Task-Specific Evaluations and AI-assisted Assessment Strategy Preferences
Zahra Ashktorab, Michael Desmond, Qian Pan +7
Evaluation of large language model (LLM) outputs requires users to make critical judgments about the best outputs across various configurations. This process is costly and takes ti…
Facilitating Human-LLM Collaboration through Factuality Scores and Source Attributions
Hyo Jin Do, Rachel Ostrand, Justin D. Weisz +5
While humans increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs), they are susceptible to generating inaccurate or false information, also known as "hallucinations". Technical advanc…
Multi-Level Explanations for Generative Language Models
Lucas Monteiro Paes, Dennis Wei, Hyo Jin Do +8
Despite the increasing use of large language models (LLMs) for context-grounded tasks like summarization and question-answering, understanding what makes an LLM produce a certain r…