activity
20242026
collaborators

5 papers

cs.LG2026

Pando: Do Interpretability Methods Work When Models Won't Explain Themselves?

Ziqian Zhong, Aashiq Muhamed, Mona T. Diab +2

Mechanistic interpretability is often motivated for alignment auditing, where a model's verbal explanations can be absent, incomplete, or misleading. Yet many evaluations do not co…

cs.CL2025

RefusalBench: Generative Evaluation of Selective Refusal in Grounded Language Models

Aashiq Muhamed, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Markus Dreyer +2

The ability of language models in RAG systems to selectively refuse to answer based on flawed context is critical for safety, yet remains a significant failure point. Our large-sca…

cs.LG2025

Position: Mechanistic Interpretability Should Prioritize Feature Consistency in SAEs

Xiangchen Song, Aashiq Muhamed, Yujia Zheng +5

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are a prominent tool in mechanistic interpretability (MI) for decomposing neural network activations into interpretable features. However, the aspiration…

cs.AI2025

CoRAG: Collaborative Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Aashiq Muhamed, Mona Diab, Virginia Smith

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models excel in knowledge-intensive tasks, especially under few-shot learning constraints. We introduce CoRAG, a framework extending RAG to col…

cs.LG2024

Decoding Dark Matter: Specialized Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Rare Concepts in Foundation Models

Aashiq Muhamed, Mona Diab, Virginia Smith

Understanding and mitigating the potential risks associated with foundation models (FMs) hinges on developing effective interpretability methods. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have em…