2 citations · 3 across the 7 of their papers we have counts for
5 papers · 1 filter
Believing without Seeing: Quality Scores for Contextualizing Vision-Language Model Explanations
Keyu He, Tejas Srinivasan, Brihi Joshi +3
When people query Vision-Language Models (VLMs) but cannot see the accompanying visual context (e.g. for blind and low-vision users), augmenting VLM predictions with natural langua…
From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centered
Siddartha Devic, Tejas Srinivasan, Jesse Thomason +2
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly assisting users in the real world, yet their reliability remains a concern. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has been heralded as a too…
Better Slow than Sorry: Introducing Positive Friction for Reliable Dialogue Systems
Mert İnan, Anthony Sicilia, Suvodip Dey +6
While theories of discourse and cognitive science have long recognized the value of unhurried pacing, recent dialogue research tends to minimize friction in conversational systems.…
WinoViz: Probing Visual Properties of Objects Under Different States
Woojeong Jin, Tejas Srinivasan, Jesse Thomason +1
Humans perceive and comprehend different visual properties of an object based on specific contexts. For instance, we know that a banana turns brown ``when it becomes rotten,'' wher…
Selective "Selective Prediction": Reducing Unnecessary Abstention in Vision-Language Reasoning
Tejas Srinivasan, Jack Hessel, Tanmay Gupta +4
Selective prediction minimizes incorrect predictions from vision-language models (VLMs) by allowing them to abstain from answering when uncertain. However, when deploying a vision-…