activity
20222026
most citedThe ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators

3 citations · 4 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing cs.LGShow all

11 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2026

WARP: Weight-Space Analysis for Recovering Training Data Portfolios

Tzu-Heng Huang, Aditya Goyal, John Cooper +1

Foundation models are routinely released to the public, yet the data recipes used to train them -- such as domain mixture weights that determine how different sources are sampled -…

cs.LG2026

Test-Time Scaling Makes Overtraining Compute-Optimal

Nicholas Roberts, Sungjun Cho, Zhiqi Gao +7

Modern LLMs scale at test-time, e.g. via repeated sampling, where inference cost grows with model size and the number of samples. This creates a trade-off that pretraining scaling…

cs.LG2026

CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluation

Jitian Zhao, Changho Shin, Tzu-Heng Huang +2

LLM-as-a-judge ensembles are the standard paradigm for scalable evaluation, but their aggregation mechanisms suffer from a fundamental flaw: they implicitly assume that judges prov…

cs.LG2025

Time To Impeach LLM-as-a-Judge: Programs are the Future of Evaluation

Tzu-Heng Huang, Harit Vishwakarma, Frederic Sala

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used to evaluate the quality of LLM generations and responses, but this leads to significant challenges: high API costs, uncertain reliabili…

cs.LG2025

R&B: Domain Regrouping and Data Mixture Balancing for Efficient Foundation Model Training

Albert Ge, Tzu-Heng Huang, John Cooper +7

Data mixing strategies have successfully reduced the costs involved in training language models. While promising, such methods suffer from two flaws. First, they rely on predetermi…

cs.LG2025

ScriptoriumWS: A Code Generation Assistant for Weak Supervision

Tzu-Heng Huang, Catherine Cao, Spencer Schoenberg +3

Weak supervision is a popular framework for overcoming the labeled data bottleneck: the need to obtain labels for training data. In weak supervision, multiple noisy-but-cheap sourc…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights

Tzu-Heng Huang, Manjot Bilkhu, John Cooper +2

Large-scale web-crawled datasets contain noise, bias, and irrelevant information, necessitating data selection techniques. Existing methods depend on hand-crafted heuristics, downs…

cs.LG2024

MoRe Fine-Tuning with 10x Fewer Parameters

Wenxuan Tan, Nicholas Roberts, Tzu-Heng Huang +5

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques have unlocked the potential to cheaply and easily specialize large pretrained models. However, the most prominent approaches, like…

cs.LG2023

Train 'n Trade: Foundations of Parameter Markets

Tzu-Heng Huang, Harit Vishwakarma, Frederic Sala

Organizations typically train large models individually. This is costly and time-consuming, particularly for large-scale foundation models. Such vertical production is known to be…

cs.LG2023

Geometry-Aware Adaptation for Pretrained Models

Nicholas Roberts, Xintong Li, Dyah Adila +4

Machine learning models -- including prominent zero-shot models -- are often trained on datasets whose labels are only a small proportion of a larger label space. Such spaces are c…

cs.LG2022★ 1 cited

AutoWS-Bench-101: Benchmarking Automated Weak Supervision with 100 Labels

Nicholas Roberts, Xintong Li, Tzu-Heng Huang +7

Weak supervision (WS) is a powerful method to build labeled datasets for training supervised models in the face of little-to-no labeled data. It replaces hand-labeling data with ag…