activity
20222026
most citedThe ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators

3 citations · 4 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.AI2026

MAGS: Multi-agent Auto-formalization Guarantees Safety for Agentic Outputs

Albert Wu, Nicholas Roberts, Tzu-Heng Huang +5

LLM coding agents now generate complex programs at a scale that makes thorough human review increasingly difficult, raising the risk of safety and security failures. Common approac…

cs.LG2026

WARP: Weight-Space Analysis for Recovering Training Data Portfolios

Tzu-Heng Huang, Aditya Goyal, John Cooper +1

Foundation models are routinely released to the public, yet the data recipes used to train them -- such as domain mixture weights that determine how different sources are sampled -…

cs.AI2026

Codifying the Judge: Scalable Evaluation via Program Distillation

Tzu-Heng Huang, Shengqi Qiu, Frederic Sala

LLM-as-a-judge has become the standard for automated evaluation, but it suffers from high cost, inference latency, and opaque decisions---limitations that undermine its scalability…

cs.LG2026

Test-Time Scaling Makes Overtraining Compute-Optimal

Nicholas Roberts, Sungjun Cho, Zhiqi Gao +7

Modern LLMs scale at test-time, e.g. via repeated sampling, where inference cost grows with model size and the number of samples. This creates a trade-off that pretraining scaling…

cs.CV2026

RubiCap: Rubric-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Dense Image Captioning

Tzu-Heng Huang, Sirajul Salekin, Javier Movellan +2

Dense image captioning is critical for vision-language pretraining and for text-to-image generation, but scaling expert-quality annotations is prohibitively expensive. While synthe…

cs.LG2026

CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluation

Jitian Zhao, Changho Shin, Tzu-Heng Huang +2

LLM-as-a-judge ensembles are the standard paradigm for scalable evaluation, but their aggregation mechanisms suffer from a fundamental flaw: they implicitly assume that judges prov…

cs.LG2025

Time To Impeach LLM-as-a-Judge: Programs are the Future of Evaluation

Tzu-Heng Huang, Harit Vishwakarma, Frederic Sala

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used to evaluate the quality of LLM generations and responses, but this leads to significant challenges: high API costs, uncertain reliabili…

cs.CL2025

Shrinking the Generation-Verification Gap with Weak Verifiers

Jon Saad-Falcon, E. Kelly Buchanan, Mayee F. Chen +9

Verifiers can improve language model capabilities by scoring and ranking responses from generated candidates. Currently, high-quality verifiers are either unscalable (e.g., humans)…

cs.LG2025

R&B: Domain Regrouping and Data Mixture Balancing for Efficient Foundation Model Training

Albert Ge, Tzu-Heng Huang, John Cooper +7

Data mixing strategies have successfully reduced the costs involved in training language models. While promising, such methods suffer from two flaws. First, they rely on predetermi…

cs.LG2025

ScriptoriumWS: A Code Generation Assistant for Weak Supervision

Tzu-Heng Huang, Catherine Cao, Spencer Schoenberg +3

Weak supervision is a popular framework for overcoming the labeled data bottleneck: the need to obtain labels for training data. In weak supervision, multiple noisy-but-cheap sourc…

cs.LG2025

Evaluating Sample Utility for Efficient Data Selection by Mimicking Model Weights

Tzu-Heng Huang, Manjot Bilkhu, John Cooper +2

Large-scale web-crawled datasets contain noise, bias, and irrelevant information, necessitating data selection techniques. Existing methods depend on hand-crafted heuristics, downs…

cs.LG2024

MoRe Fine-Tuning with 10x Fewer Parameters

Wenxuan Tan, Nicholas Roberts, Tzu-Heng Huang +5

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques have unlocked the potential to cheaply and easily specialize large pretrained models. However, the most prominent approaches, like…

cs.CL2024★ 3 cited

The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators

Tzu-Heng Huang, Catherine Cao, Vaishnavi Bhargava +1

Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately,…

cs.CV2024

Multimodal Data Curation via Object Detection and Filter Ensembles

Tzu-Heng Huang, Changho Shin, Sui Jiet Tay +2

We propose an approach for curating multimodal data that we used for our entry in the 2023 DataComp competition filtering track. Our technique combines object detection and weak su…

cs.LG2023

Train 'n Trade: Foundations of Parameter Markets

Tzu-Heng Huang, Harit Vishwakarma, Frederic Sala

Organizations typically train large models individually. This is costly and time-consuming, particularly for large-scale foundation models. Such vertical production is known to be…

cs.LG2023

Geometry-Aware Adaptation for Pretrained Models

Nicholas Roberts, Xintong Li, Dyah Adila +4

Machine learning models -- including prominent zero-shot models -- are often trained on datasets whose labels are only a small proportion of a larger label space. Such spaces are c…

cs.LG2022★ 1 cited

AutoWS-Bench-101: Benchmarking Automated Weak Supervision with 100 Labels

Nicholas Roberts, Xintong Li, Tzu-Heng Huang +7

Weak supervision (WS) is a powerful method to build labeled datasets for training supervised models in the face of little-to-no labeled data. It replaces hand-labeling data with ag…