activity
20242026
most citedAI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability

2 citations · 6 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

12 papers

cs.AI2026

Can LLM design high-quality experiments? A Comprehensive and Systematic Benchmark on Autonomous Experimental Design

Zejun Liu, Jian Wu, Ru Peng +4

AI for Research (AI4Research) leverages AI to automate and improve scientific workflows. While experimental design is a critical stage of the research process, prior work has focus…

cs.CL2026

Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale

Ang Li, Ben Liu, Bin Han +215

Efficient and scalable agentic intelligence requires models that can deliver both low-latency responses and strong reasoning capabilities while remaining practical to train, serve,…

cs.AI2025

How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?

Qiujie Xie, Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu +9

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) is propelling automated scientific discovery to the next level, with LLM-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist systems now taki…

cs.CL2025

MCEval: A Dynamic Framework for Fair Multilingual Cultural Evaluation of LLMs

Shulin Huang, Linyi Yang, Yue Zhang

Large language models exhibit cultural biases and limited cross-cultural understanding capabilities, particularly when serving diverse global user populations. We propose MCEval, a…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability

Minjun Zhu, Qiujie Xie, Yixuan Weng +4

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist represents a paradigm shift in scientific discovery, with large language models (LLMs) taking the lead as the primary execut…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process

Minjun Zhu, Yixuan Weng, Linyi Yang +1

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly utilized in scientific research assessment, particularly in automated paper review. However, existing LLM-based review systems face si…

cs.CL2025

ThinkBench: Dynamic Out-of-Distribution Evaluation for Robust LLM Reasoning

Shulin Huang, Linyi Yang, Yan Song +9

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) poses significant challenges, particularly due to issues of data contamination and the leakage of correct answers. To address these challeng…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Direct Value Optimization: Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMs with Refined Values

Hongbo Zhang, Han Cui, Guangsheng Bao +3

We introduce Direct Value Optimization (DVO), an innovative reinforcement learning framework for enhancing large language models in complex reasoning tasks. Unlike traditional meth…

cs.CL2025

League: Leaderboard Generation on Demand

Jian Wu, Jiayu Zhang, Dongyuan Li +5

This paper introduces Leaderboard Auto Generation (LAG), a novel and well-organized framework for automatic generation of leaderboards on a given research topic in rapidly evolving…

cs.AI2024

Constrain Alignment with Sparse Autoencoders

Qingyu Yin, Chak Tou Leong, Minjun Zhu +7

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences remains a key challenge. While post-training techniques like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review

Yixuan Weng, Minjun Zhu, Guangsheng Bao +4

The automation of scientific discovery has been a long-standing goal within the research community, driven by the potential to accelerate knowledge creation. While significant prog…

cs.CL2024

Locking Down the Finetuned LLMs Safety

Minjun Zhu, Linyi Yang, Yifan Wei +2

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on additional datasets is often necessary to optimize them for specific downstream tasks. However, existing safety alignment measures, whic…