activity
20232026
most citedBlack-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits

72 citations · 98 across the 14 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

16 papers

cs.CL2026

Sycophancy Towards Researchers Drives Performative Misalignment

David D. Baek, Xinnuo Li, Anay Gupta +4

The increasing situational awareness of language models raises safety concerns: models might be aware when they are evaluated, and adjust their behavior to evade monitoring and res…

cs.AI2026

A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring

Usman Anwar, Julianna Piskorz, David D. Baek +6

Large language models are beginning to show steganographic capabilities. Such capabilities could allow misaligned models to evade oversight mechanisms. Yet principled methods to de…

cs.AI2025

The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities

Yoshua Bengio, Tegan Maharaj, Luke Ong +84

Rapidly improving AI capabilities and autonomy hold significant promise of transformation, but are also driving vigorous debate on how to ensure that AI is safe, i.e., trustworthy,…

cs.LG2025

Dense SAE Latents Are Features, Not Bugs

Xiaoqing Sun, Alessandro Stolfo, Joshua Engels +4

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are designed to extract interpretable features from language models by enforcing a sparsity constraint. Ideally, training an SAE would yield latents that…

cs.AI2025

Scaling Laws For Scalable Oversight

Joshua Engels, David D. Baek, Subhash Kantamneni +1

Scalable oversight, the process by which weaker AI systems supervise stronger ones, has been proposed as a key strategy to control future superintelligent systems. However, it is s…

cs.LG2025

Towards Understanding Distilled Reasoning Models: A Representational Approach

David D. Baek, Max Tegmark

In this paper, we investigate how model distillation impacts the development of reasoning features in large language models (LLMs). To explore this, we train a crosscoder on Qwen-s…

cs.LG2025

Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing

Subhash Kantamneni, Joshua Engels, Senthooran Rajamanoharan +2

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for interpreting concepts represented in large language model (LLM) activations. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the…

cs.LG2025★ 9 cited

Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability

Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson +26

Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities in order to accomplish concrete scientific and engineering goa…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

Low-Rank Adapting Models for Sparse Autoencoders

Matthew Chen, Joshua Engels, Max Tegmark

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose language model representations into a sparse set of linear latent vectors. Recent works have improved SAEs using language model gradients, but…

q-bio.NC2024★ 11 cited

The Geometry of Concepts: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Structure

Yuxiao Li, Eric J. Michaud, David D. Baek +3

Sparse autoencoders have recently produced dictionaries of high-dimensional vectors corresponding to the universe of concepts represented by large language models. We find that thi…

cs.LG2024

Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoders

Joshua Engels, Logan Riggs, Max Tegmark

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising technique for decomposing language model activations into interpretable linear features. However, current SAEs fall short of completely e…

cs.LG2024

Investigating Representation Universality: Case Study on Genealogical Representations

David D. Baek, Yuxiao Li, Max Tegmark

Motivated by interpretability and reliability, we investigate whether large language models (LLMs) deploy universal geometric structures to encode discrete, graph-structured knowle…

cs.LG2024

Efficient Dictionary Learning with Switch Sparse Autoencoders

Anish Mudide, Joshua Engels, Eric J. Michaud +2

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a recent technique for decomposing neural network activations into human-interpretable features. However, in order for SAEs to identify all features…

cs.SE2024★ 5 cited

DafnyBench: A Benchmark for Formal Software Verification

Chloe Loughridge, Qinyi Sun, Seth Ahrenbach +7

We introduce DafnyBench, the largest benchmark of its kind for training and evaluating machine learning systems for formal software verification. We test the ability of LLMs such a…

cs.CY2024★ 72 cited

Black-Box Access is Insufficient for Rigorous AI Audits

Stephen Casper, Carson Ezell, Charlotte Siegmann +18

External audits of AI systems are increasingly recognized as a key mechanism for AI governance. The effectiveness of an audit, however, depends on the degree of access granted to a…

cs.CY2023

Divide-and-Conquer Dynamics in AI-Driven Disempowerment

Peter S. Park, Max Tegmark

AI companies are attempting to create AI systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work. Current AI models are already automating away the livelihoods of some ar…