activity
20242026
most citedGLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

4 citations · 6 across the 16 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

17 papers

cs.CL2026

RLAR: An Agentic Reward System for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning on Large Language Models

Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Bosi Wen +4

Large language model alignment via reinforcement learning depends critically on reward function quality. However, static, domain-specific reward models are often costly to train an…

cs.CL2026

RAVEL: Reasoning Agents for Validating and Evaluating LLM Text Synthesis

Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo +9

Large Language Models have evolved from single-round generators into long-horizon agents, capable of complex text synthesis scenarios. However, current evaluation frameworks lack t…

cs.AI2026

TraceSIR: A Multi-Agent Framework for Structured Analysis and Reporting of Agentic Execution Traces

Shu-Xun Yang, Cunxiang Wang, Haoke Zhang +12

Agentic systems augment large language models with external tools and iterative decision making, enabling complex tasks such as deep research, function calling, and coding. However…

cs.LG2026★ 1 cited

GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

GLM-5-Team, :, Aohan Zeng +184

We present GLM-5, a next-generation foundation model designed to transition the paradigm of vibe coding to agentic engineering. Building upon the agentic, reasoning, and coding (AR…

cs.AI2026

DVD: A Robust Method for Detecting Variant Contamination in Large Language Model Evaluation

Renzhao Liang, Jingru Chen, Bo Jia +7

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is increasingly confounded by \emph{variant contamination}: the training corpus contains semantically equivalent yet lexically or syntactica…

cs.CL2026

MVSS: A Unified Framework for Multi-View Structured Survey Generation

Yinqi Liu, Yueqi Zhu, Yongkang Zhang +7

Scientific surveys require not only summarizing large bodies of literature, but also organizing them into clear and coherent conceptual structures. However, existing automatic surv…

cs.CL2026

Beyond Literal Mapping: Benchmarking and Improving Non-Literal Translation Evaluation

Yanzhi Tian, Cunxiang Wang, Zeming Liu +5

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Machine Translation (MT), applying them to linguistically complex domains-such as Social Network Services, literature etc.…

cs.CL2025

IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation

Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang +6

Instruction-following is a fundamental ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring their generated outputs to follow multiple constraints imposed in input instructions. Nume…

cs.CL2025★ 4 cited

GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models

5 Team, Aohan Zeng, Xin Lv +167

We present GLM-4.5, an open-source Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language model with 355B total parameters and 32B activated parameters, featuring a hybrid reasoning method that s…

cs.CL2025

Temporal Self-Rewarding Language Models: Decoupling Chosen-Rejected via Past-Future

Yidong Wang, Xin Wang, Cunxiang Wang +9

Self-Rewarding Language Models propose an architecture in which the Large Language Models(LLMs) both generates responses and evaluates its own outputs via LLM-as-a-Judge prompting,…

cs.AI2025

UDA: Unsupervised Debiasing Alignment for Pair-wise LLM-as-a-Judge

Yang Zhang, Cunxiang Wang, Lindong Wu +4

Pairwise evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a common paradigm, but it is prone to preference bias, where judges systematically favor certain outputs, such as their own.…

cs.CL2025

Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinement

Tianshu Yu, Chao Xiang, Mingchuan Yang +8

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable evaluation and critique capabilities, providing insightful feedback and identifying flaws in various tasks. However, limit…

cs.CL2025

Unlocking Recursive Thinking of LLMs: Alignment via Refinement

Haoke Zhang, Xiaobo Liang, Cunxiang Wang +2

The OpenAI o1-series models have demonstrated that leveraging long-form Chain of Thought (CoT) can substantially enhance performance. However, the recursive thinking capabilities o…

cs.AI2025

StepMathAgent: A Step-Wise Agent for Evaluating Mathematical Processes through Tree-of-Error

Shu-Xun Yang, Cunxiang Wang, Yidong Wang +3

Evaluating mathematical capabilities is critical for assessing the overall performance of large language models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation methods often focus solely on f…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models

Yida Lu, Jiale Cheng, Zhexin Zhang +7

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in understanding and generating long sequences, new safety concerns have been introduced through the long context. However, the…

cs.CL2025

HPSS: Heuristic Prompting Strategy Search for LLM Evaluators

Bosi Wen, Pei Ke, Yufei Sun +6

Since the adoption of large language models (LLMs) for text evaluation has become increasingly prevalent in the field of natural language processing (NLP), a series of existing wor…

cs.CL2024

SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models

Jiale Cheng, Xiao Liu, Cunxiang Wang +7

Instruction-following is a fundamental capability of language models, requiring the model to recognize even the most subtle requirements in the instructions and accurately reflect…