activity
20232025
most citedAutomated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation

40 citations · 45 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL20251 cited

Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theory

Emily Corvi, Hannah Washington, Stefanie Reed +9

Representational harms are widely recognized among fairness-related harms caused by generative language systems. However, their definitions are commonly under-specified. We make a…

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY20242 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.CL20242 cited

Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labels

Nicholas Pangakis, Samuel Wolken

Computational social science (CSS) practitioners often rely on human-labeled data to fine-tune supervised text classifiers. We assess the potential for researchers to augment or re…

cs.CL202340 cited

Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation

Nicholas Pangakis, Samuel Wolken, Neil Fasching

Generative large language models (LLMs) can be a powerful tool for augmenting text annotation procedures, but their performance varies across annotation tasks due to prompt quality…