activity
20232026
most citedAutomated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation

40 citations · 48 across the 9 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

9 papers

cs.CY2026

What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks

Meera Desai, Sang T. Truong, Hanna Wallach +8

Benchmarks play a central role in the development and governance of models, yet it is often unclear whether they actually measure the concepts they purport to measure (e.g., reason…

cs.CL2026

ASSERT: A Measurement Pipeline for GenAI Audits

Riccardo Fogliato, Abhinav Palia, Xiawei Wang +11

Audits of generative AI (GenAI) systems often summarize behavior as a reported rate: how often the audited system complies with policy. Researchers and stakeholders use that rate t…

cs.CL2025★ 1 cited

Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theory

Emily Corvi, Hannah Washington, Stefanie Reed +9

Representational harms are widely recognized among fairness-related harms caused by generative language systems. However, their definitions are commonly under-specified. We make a…

cs.CY2025★ 1 cited

Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, A. Feder Cooper +17

The measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems lack sufficient scientific rigor, leading to what has been described as "a tangle of sloppy tests [and] a…

cs.CY2024

A Shared Standard for Valid Measurement of Generative AI Systems' Capabilities, Risks, and Impacts

Alexandra Chouldechova, Chad Atalla, Solon Barocas +11

The valid measurement of generative AI (GenAI) systems' capabilities, risks, and impacts forms the bedrock of our ability to evaluate these systems. We introduce a shared standard…

cs.CY2024★ 2 cited

Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge

Hanna Wallach, Meera Desai, Nicholas Pangakis +17

Across academia, industry, and government, there is an increasing awareness that the measurement tasks involved in evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems are especially difficult…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Keeping Humans in the Loop: Human-Centered Automated Annotation with Generative AI

Nicholas Pangakis, Samuel Wolken

Automated text annotation is a compelling use case for generative large language models (LLMs) in social media research. Recent work suggests that LLMs can achieve strong performan…

cs.CL2024★ 2 cited

Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labels

Nicholas Pangakis, Samuel Wolken

Computational social science (CSS) practitioners often rely on human-labeled data to fine-tune supervised text classifiers. We assess the potential for researchers to augment or re…

cs.CL2023★ 40 cited

Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation

Nicholas Pangakis, Samuel Wolken, Neil Fasching

Generative large language models (LLMs) can be a powerful tool for augmenting text annotation procedures, but their performance varies across annotation tasks due to prompt quality…