6 citations · 9 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for
6 papers · 1 filter
Visualizing Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks as Layered Graphs
Martin Nöllenburg, Christian Pirker, Anna Rapberger +2
The visualization of argumentation frameworks (AFs) is crucial for enabling a wide applicability of argumentative tools. However, their visualization is often considered only as an…
PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs
Purin Sukpanichnant, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni
Peer review is an essential process to determine the quality of papers submitted to scientific conferences or journals. However, it is subjective and prone to biases. Several studi…
Instantiations and Computational Aspects of Non-Flat Assumption-based Argumentation
Tuomo Lehtonen, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni +2
Most existing computational tools for assumption-based argumentation (ABA) focus on so-called flat frameworks, disregarding the more general case. In this paper, we study an instan…
Argumentative Causal Discovery
Fabrizio Russo, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni
Causal discovery amounts to unearthing causal relationships amongst features in data. It is a crucial companion to causal inference, necessary to build scientific knowledge without…
Contestable AI needs Computational Argumentation
Francesco Leofante, Hamed Ayoobi, Adam Dejl +10
AI has become pervasive in recent years, but state-of-the-art approaches predominantly neglect the need for AI systems to be contestable. Instead, contestability is advocated by AI…
On the Correspondence of Non-flat Assumption-based Argumentation and Logic Programming with Negation as Failure in the Head
Anna Rapberger, Markus Ulbricht, Francesca Toni
The relation between (a fragment of) assumption-based argumentation (ABA) and logic programs (LPs) under stable model semantics is well-studied. However, for obtaining this relatio…