6 citations · 9 across the 12 of their papers we have counts for
13 papers
Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks and Supports
Matti Berthold, Lydia Blümel, Giovanni Buraglio +1
This work proposes novel splitting techniques for argumentation formalisms that incorporate supports between defeasible elements. We base our studies on bipolar set-based argumenta…
Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Assumption-Based Argumentation
Preesha Gehlot, Anna Rapberger, Fabrizio Russo +1
Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) is a powerful structured argumentation formalism, but exact computation of extensions under stable semantics is intractable for large framework…
On Strong and Weak Admissibility in Non-Flat Assumption-Based Argumentation
Matti Berthold, Lydia Blümel, Anna Rapberger
In this work, we broaden the investigation of admissibility notions in the context of assumption-based argumentation (ABA). More specifically, we study two prominent alternatives t…
Argumentative Debates for Transparent Bias Detection [Technical Report]
Hamed Ayoobi, Nico Potyka, Anna Rapberger +1
As the use of AI in society grows, addressing emerging biases is essential to prevent systematic discrimination. Several bias detection methods have been proposed, but, with few ex…
On Gradual Semantics for Assumption-Based Argumentation
Anna Rapberger, Fabrizio Russo, Antonio Rago +1
In computational argumentation, gradual semantics are fine-grained alternatives to extension-based and labelling-based semantics . They ascribe a dialectical strength to (component…
Visualizing Extensions of Argumentation Frameworks as Layered Graphs
Martin Nöllenburg, Christian Pirker, Anna Rapberger +2
The visualization of argumentation frameworks (AFs) is crucial for enabling a wide applicability of argumentative tools. However, their visualization is often considered only as an…
PeerArg: Argumentative Peer Review with LLMs
Purin Sukpanichnant, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni
Peer review is an essential process to determine the quality of papers submitted to scientific conferences or journals. However, it is subjective and prone to biases. Several studi…
Instantiations and Computational Aspects of Non-Flat Assumption-based Argumentation
Tuomo Lehtonen, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni +2
Most existing computational tools for assumption-based argumentation (ABA) focus on so-called flat frameworks, disregarding the more general case. In this paper, we study an instan…
Argumentative Causal Discovery
Fabrizio Russo, Anna Rapberger, Francesca Toni
Causal discovery amounts to unearthing causal relationships amongst features in data. It is a crucial companion to causal inference, necessary to build scientific knowledge without…
Contestable AI needs Computational Argumentation
Francesco Leofante, Hamed Ayoobi, Adam Dejl +10
AI has become pervasive in recent years, but state-of-the-art approaches predominantly neglect the need for AI systems to be contestable. Instead, contestability is advocated by AI…
On the Correspondence of Non-flat Assumption-based Argumentation and Logic Programming with Negation as Failure in the Head
Anna Rapberger, Markus Ulbricht, Francesca Toni
The relation between (a fragment of) assumption-based argumentation (ABA) and logic programs (LPs) under stable model semantics is well-studied. However, for obtaining this relatio…
The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation Under a Claim-Centric View
Michael Bernreiter, Wolfgang Dvorak, Anna Rapberger +1
In this paper, we study the effect of preferences in abstract argumentation under a claim-centric perspective. Recent work has revealed that semantical and computational properties…
Concurrence for well-formed CAFs: Naive Semantics
Rafael Kiesel, Anna Rapberger
In the area of claim-based reasoning in abstract argumentation, a claim-based semantics is said to be concurrent in a given framework if all its variants yield the same extensions.…