most citedfairlib: A Unified Framework for Assessing and Improving Classification Fairness

8 citations · 15 across the 5 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

5 papers

cs.CL20232 cited

Language models are not naysayers: An analysis of language models on negation benchmarks

Thinh Hung Truong, Timothy Baldwin, Karin Verspoor +1

Negation has been shown to be a major bottleneck for masked language models, such as BERT. However, whether this finding still holds for larger-sized auto-regressive language model…

cs.LG20223 cited

Systematic Evaluation of Predictive Fairness

Xudong Han, Aili Shen, Trevor Cohn +2

Mitigating bias in training on biased datasets is an important open problem. Several techniques have been proposed, however the typical evaluation regime is very limited, consideri…

cs.LG20222 cited

Optimising Equal Opportunity Fairness in Model Training

Aili Shen, Xudong Han, Trevor Cohn +2

Real-world datasets often encode stereotypes and societal biases. Such biases can be implicitly captured by trained models, leading to biased predictions and exacerbating existing…

cs.LG20228 cited

fairlib: A Unified Framework for Assessing and Improving Classification Fairness

Xudong Han, Aili Shen, Yitong Li +3

This paper presents fairlib, an open-source framework for assessing and improving classification fairness. It provides a systematic framework for quickly reproducing existing basel…

cs.CL2022

Towards Equal Opportunity Fairness through Adversarial Learning

Xudong Han, Timothy Baldwin, Trevor Cohn

Adversarial training is a common approach for bias mitigation in natural language processing. Although most work on debiasing is motivated by equal opportunity, it is not explicitl…