activity
20212026
most citedTraining a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

391 citations · 838 across the 62 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators
Showing 2024Show all

16 papers · 1 filter

cs.LG2024★ 5 cited

BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoders

Bart Bussmann, Patrick Leask, Neel Nanda

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a powerful tool for interpreting language model activations by decomposing them into sparse, interpretable features. A popular approach i…

cs.LG2024

Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Tasks

Adam Karvonen, Can Rager, Samuel Marks +1

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are an interpretability technique aimed at decomposing neural network activations into interpretable units. However, a major bottleneck for SAE developme…

cs.CL2024★ 1 cited

Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Models

Javier Ferrando, Oscar Obeso, Senthooran Rajamanoharan +1

Hallucinations in large language models are a widespread problem, yet the mechanisms behind whether models will hallucinate are poorly understood, limiting our ability to solve thi…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2

Tom Lieberum, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy +7

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an unsupervised method for learning a sparse decomposition of a neural network's latent representations into seemingly interpretable features. Despit…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Tom Lieberum, Nicolas Sonnerat +4

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising unsupervised approach for identifying causally relevant and interpretable linear features in a language model's (LM) activations. To be u…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders

Connor Kissane, Robert Krzyzanowski, Joseph Isaac Bloom +2

Decomposing model activations into interpretable components is a key open problem in mechanistic interpretability. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for decomposing t…

cs.LG2024

Confidence Regulation Neurons in Language Models

Alessandro Stolfo, Ben Wu, Wes Gurnee +4

Despite their widespread use, the mechanisms by which large language models (LLMs) represent and regulate uncertainty in next-token predictions remain largely unexplored. This stud…

cs.LG2024★ 6 cited

Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuits

Jacob Dunefsky, Philippe Chlenski, Neel Nanda

A key goal in mechanistic interpretability is circuit analysis: finding sparse subgraphs of models corresponding to specific behaviors or capabilities. However, MLP sublayers make…

cs.LG2024★ 9 cited

Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Direction

Andy Arditi, Oscar Obeso, Aaquib Syed +4

Conversational large language models are fine-tuned for both instruction-following and safety, resulting in models that obey benign requests but refuse harmful ones. While this ref…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control

Aleksandar Makelov, George Lange, Neel Nanda

Disentangling model activations into meaningful features is a central problem in interpretability. However, the absence of ground-truth for these features in realistic scenarios ma…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith +5

Recent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by find…

cs.LG2024★ 6 cited

How to use and interpret activation patching

Stefan Heimersheim, Neel Nanda

Activation patching is a popular mechanistic interpretability technique, but has many subtleties regarding how it is applied and how one may interpret the results. We provide a sum…

cs.LG2024

AtP*: An efficient and scalable method for localizing LLM behaviour to components

János Kramár, Tom Lieberum, Rohin Shah +1

Activation Patching is a method of directly computing causal attributions of behavior to model components. However, applying it exhaustively requires a sweep with cost scaling line…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Summing Up the Facts: Additive Mechanisms Behind Factual Recall in LLMs

Bilal Chughtai, Alan Cooney, Neel Nanda

How do transformer-based large language models (LLMs) store and retrieve knowledge? We focus on the most basic form of this task -- factual recall, where the model is tasked with e…

cs.LG2024

Explorations of Self-Repair in Language Models

Cody Rushing, Neel Nanda

Prior interpretability research studying narrow distributions has preliminarily identified self-repair, a phenomena where if components in large language models are ablated, later…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Universal Neurons in GPT2 Language Models

Wes Gurnee, Theo Horsley, Zifan Carl Guo +5

A basic question within the emerging field of mechanistic interpretability is the degree to which neural networks learn the same underlying mechanisms. In other words, are neural m…