most citedBecause we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability

1 citations · 1 across the 11 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

12 papers

cs.AI2026

Subliminal Learning Is Steering Vector Distillation

Camila Blank, Agam Bhatia, Senthooran Rajamanoharan +2

Subliminal learning refers to a student language model acquiring a teacher's traits (e.g. a system-prompted preference for owls) when fine-tuned on the teacher's outputs, despite t…

cs.LG2026

Building Better Activation Oracles

Jan Bauer, Celeste De Schamphelaere, Adam Karvonen +2

Activation Oracles (AOs) are promising methods for interpreting residual stream activations. However, current AOs face important issues, such as hallucinations and vagueness. Addit…

cs.LG2026

What's the plan? Metrics for implicit planning in LLMs and their application to rhyme generation and question answering

Jim Maar, Denis Paperno, Callum Stuart McDougall +1

Prior work suggests that language models, while trained on next token prediction, show implicit planning behavior: they may select the next token in preparation to a predicted futu…

cs.LG2025

Too Late to Recall: Explaining the Two-Hop Problem in Multimodal Knowledge Retrieval

Constantin Venhoff, Ashkan Khakzar, Sonia Joseph +2

Training vision language models (VLMs) aims to align visual representations from a vision encoder with the textual representations of a pretrained large language model (LLM). Howev…

cs.AI2025

Internal states before wait modulate reasoning patterns

Dmitrii Troitskii, Koyena Pal, Chris Wendler +2

Prior work has shown that a significant driver of performance in reasoning models is their ability to reason and self-correct. A distinctive marker in these reasoning traces is the…

cs.LG2025

Thought Branches: Interpreting LLM Reasoning Requires Resampling

Uzay Macar, Paul C. Bogdan, Senthooran Rajamanoharan +1

Most work interpreting reasoning models studies only a single chain-of-thought (CoT), yet these models define distributions over many possible CoTs. We argue that studying a single…

cs.AI2025

Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When

Constantin Venhoff, Iván Arcuschin, Philip Torr +2

What do thinking language models learn during training that their base models lack? We first present an unsupervised method that discovers a model's reasoning behaviors by training…

cs.LG2025

RelP: Faithful and Efficient Circuit Discovery in Language Models via Relevance Patching

Farnoush Rezaei Jafari, Oliver Eberle, Ashkan Khakzar +1

Activation patching is a standard method in mechanistic interpretability for localizing the components of a model responsible for specific behaviors, but it is computationally expe…

cs.LG2025

Reasoning-Finetuning Repurposes Latent Representations in Base Models

Jake Ward, Chuqiao Lin, Constantin Venhoff +1

Backtracking, an emergent behavior elicited by reasoning fine-tuning, has been shown to be a key mechanism in reasoning models' enhanced capabilities. Prior work has succeeded in m…

cs.CL2025

Simple Mechanistic Explanations for Out-Of-Context Reasoning

Atticus Wang, Joshua Engels, Oliver Clive-Griffin +2

Out-of-context reasoning (OOCR) is a phenomenon in which fine-tuned LLMs exhibit surprisingly deep out-of-distribution generalization. Rather than learning shallow heuristics, they…

cs.CV2025

How Visual Representations Map to Language Feature Space in Multimodal LLMs

Constantin Venhoff, Ashkan Khakzar, Sonia Joseph +2

Effective multimodal reasoning depends on the alignment of visual and linguistic representations, yet the mechanisms by which vision-language models (VLMs) achieve this alignment r…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability

Been Kim, John Hewitt, Neel Nanda +2

The era of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a new opportunity for interpretability--agentic interpretability: a multi-turn conversation with an LLM wherein the LLM proactively…