activity
20212026
most citedInterpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small

54 citations · 125 across the 25 of their papers we have counts for

collaborators

25 papers

cs.LG2026

Automatically Finding Reward Model Biases

Atticus Wang, Iván Arcuschin, Arthur Conmy

Reward models are central to large language model (LLM) post-training. However, past work has shown that they can reward spurious or undesirable attributes such as length, format,…

cs.LG2025

Eliciting Secret Knowledge from Language Models

Bartosz Cywiński, Emil Ryd, Rowan Wang +4

We study secret elicitation: discovering knowledge that an AI possesses but does not explicitly verbalize. As a testbed, we train three families of large language models (LLMs) to…

cs.AI2025

Base Models Know How to Reason, Thinking Models Learn When

Constantin Venhoff, Iván Arcuschin, Philip Torr +2

What do thinking language models learn during training that their base models lack? We first present an unsupervised method that discovers a model's reasoning behaviors by training…

cs.CV2025

Line of Sight: On Linear Representations in VLLMs

Achyuta Rajaram, Sarah Schwettmann, Jacob Andreas +1

Language models can be equipped with multimodal capabilities by fine-tuning on embeddings of visual inputs. But how do such multimodal models represent images in their hidden activ…

cs.LG2025

Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?

Paul C. Bogdan, Uzay Macar, Neel Nanda +1

Current frontier large-language models rely on reasoning to achieve state-of-the-art performance. Many existing interpretability are limited in this area, as standard methods have…

cs.LG2025★ 1 cited

Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectors

Constantin Venhoff, Iván Arcuschin, Philip Torr +2

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of thinking language models that generate extensive internal reasoning chains before producing responses…

cs.LG2025

Interpreting Large Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Dictionary Learning

Stepan Shabalin, Ayush Panda, Dmitrii Kharlapenko +3

Sparse autoencoders are a promising new approach for decomposing language model activations for interpretation and control. They have been applied successfully to vision transforme…

cs.LG2025

Scaling sparse feature circuit finding for in-context learning

Dmitrii Kharlapenko, Stepan Shabalin, Fazl Barez +2

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular tool for interpreting large language model activations, but their utility in addressing open questions in interpretability remains unclear.…

cs.AI2025★ 1 cited

An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security

Rohin Shah, Alex Irpan, Alexander Matt Turner +27

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) promises transformative benefits but also presents significant risks. We develop an approach to address the risk of harms consequential enough…

cs.LG2025

SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretability

Adam Karvonen, Can Rager, Johnny Lin +12

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular technique for interpreting language model activations, and there is extensive recent work on improving SAE effectiveness. However, most pri…

cs.AI2025★ 2 cited

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful

Iván Arcuschin, Jett Janiak, Robert Krzyzanowski +3

Recent studies indicate that when faced with explicit biases in prompts, models often omit mentioning these biases in their Chain-of-Thought (CoT) output, revealing that verbalized…

cs.LG2025★ 9 cited

Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability

Lee Sharkey, Bilal Chughtai, Joshua Batson +26

Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities in order to accomplish concrete scientific and engineering goa…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Improving Steering Vectors by Targeting Sparse Autoencoder Features

Sviatoslav Chalnev, Matthew Siu, Arthur Conmy

To control the behavior of language models, steering methods attempt to ensure that outputs of the model satisfy specific pre-defined properties. Adding steering vectors to the mod…

cs.LG2024

Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models

Eoin Farrell, Yeu-Tong Lau, Arthur Conmy

We investigate whether sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to remove knowledge from language models. We use the biology subset of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy dataset a…

cs.LG2024★ 1 cited

Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2

Tom Lieberum, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy +7

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an unsupervised method for learning a sparse decomposition of a neural network's latent representations into seemingly interpretable features. Despit…

cs.LG2024★ 3 cited

Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Tom Lieberum, Nicolas Sonnerat +4

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising unsupervised approach for identifying causally relevant and interpretable linear features in a language model's (LM) activations. To be u…

cs.LG2024★ 4 cited

Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders

Connor Kissane, Robert Krzyzanowski, Joseph Isaac Bloom +2

Decomposing model activations into interpretable components is a key open problem in mechanistic interpretability. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for decomposing t…

cs.LG2024★ 2 cited

Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Arthur Conmy, Lewis Smith +5

Recent work has found that sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are an effective technique for unsupervised discovery of interpretable features in language models' (LMs) activations, by find…

cs.CR2024★ 7 cited

Stealing Part of a Production Language Model

Nicholas Carlini, Daniel Paleka, Krishnamurthy Dj Dvijotham +11

We introduce the first model-stealing attack that extracts precise, nontrivial information from black-box production language models like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Google's PaLM-2. Speci…

cs.LG2023★ 3 cited

Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The Wild

Rhys Gould, Euan Ong, George Ogden +1

In this work we present successor heads: attention heads that increment tokens with a natural ordering, such as numbers, months, and days. For example, successor heads increment 'M…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Attribution Patching Outperforms Automated Circuit Discovery

Aaquib Syed, Can Rager, Arthur Conmy

Automated interpretability research has recently attracted attention as a potential research direction that could scale explanations of neural network behavior to large models. Exi…

cs.LG2023★ 2 cited

Copy Suppression: Comprehensively Understanding an Attention Head

Callum McDougall, Arthur Conmy, Cody Rushing +2

We present a single attention head in GPT-2 Small that has one main role across the entire training distribution. If components in earlier layers predict a certain token, and this…

cs.LG2023★ 33 cited

Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability

Arthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch +2

Through considerable effort and intuition, several recent works have reverse-engineered nontrivial behaviors of transformer models. This paper systematizes the mechanistic interpre…

cs.LG2022★ 54 cited

Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small

Kevin Wang, Alexandre Variengien, Arthur Conmy +2

Research in mechanistic interpretability seeks to explain behaviors of machine learning models in terms of their internal components. However, most previous work either focuses on…